I am an art student. What should I write for the basic knowledge of photography for photography majors? What does the evaluation say?

I am not an art student, but I like photography. I can only introduce some basic knowledge of photography.

First of all, I think we should pay attention to composition. No matter how good the theme is, if there is no inappropriate, appropriate and creative composition, then the photos taken are tasteless and boring.

Then pay attention to the light, which is the soul of the photo. Different angles, quantities, colors and intensities of light can bring different effects to photos.

Then there is creativity. What equipment and equipment do you have? What do you want the photo to look like? How long is the focal length, how many shutters and how big is the aperture. I forgot where I read the sentence "A good-looking photo is uncomfortable, but a comfortable photo is not good-looking". The comfort here is not the comfort of photos, but the shooting angle of photography. In other words, if you shoot from the perspective that others can see, it can only be plain.

It's PS now. Generally, the original PS film is not required in the photo competition, that is, whatever you shoot is what you want. But now it is impossible to take commercial photos without PS, and PS retouching has become the basis of photography.

As for the evaluation of the picture, it is nothing more than evaluating from the above points, whether the composition is regular, whether it is novel, whether the light is appropriate, whether it is unique, whether the focal length, aperture and shutter are used properly, whether the picture should be done in the later stage, and whether it is over or insufficient in the later stage.

Isn't it funny that amateurs teach professionals? I hope it's useful to you ~ ~ ~ ~ If not, just ignore it.