Is there any equipment or software that can shoot for a long time?

The solution is the time-lapse photography function of the mobile phone.

I'm shooting this punch-in video. Every day, it is 7 hours long and 1 2 hours short. There are several parameters involved here, such as single lens shooting time, calorific value, video material size, power consumption and fixed fuselage. At first, I also thought that the most important parameters were the length of single lens and heating. However, this is not the case after actual measurement. The most important parameter is the video material size.

1, the first Sony dv to be tested. It can be said that shooting long videos is its specialty. There is almost no particular fever, and the single-lens shooting market depends entirely on storage and batteries. A 32g card needs about five hours of video, while a single battery supports about two hours of shooting. It can be said that the demand can be met in time. But the shortcomings are also obvious. Dv has no frame-by-frame shooting function, so it is shortened after shooting the video.

Need to enter the editing software, rendering time is very long, and easy to crash. It is troublesome enough to copy more than one 10g video material back and forth at a time. In addition, it has to be said that the quality of the pictures taken by dv really can't keep up with the demand, and even it is hung up by mobile phones under some preconditions. One of the outstanding advantages of dv is its wide zoom range, but it is not used at all when shooting frame-by-frame video. Dv goes first

2. The second test is the action of GoPro and DJI. There are many comments on the internet, and so do my friends, so I have tried them all, each with its own advantages and disadvantages, and they have all reached the level of concealment. It is also good to shoot this demand one by one. But also can be placed in a more free position and angle. But in the end, I didn't use the solution of sports camera for the following reasons:

It costs about three or four thousand yuan to buy sports cameras and food materials, and many of their functions, such as anti-shake, are wasted when I don't use them. There is no obvious advantage in the competition with other types of equipment in image quality.

3, the third evaluation is no reaction. Of course, the picture quality is good, and the continuous shooting time is far beyond my expectation. After shooting for more than two hours, the battery was dead. The disadvantage is that the video material is large and the placement position is not free. Moreover, if I shoot on the same day, I am very distressed and worried about accidentally touching the tripod.

4, the fourth test equipment is very clever, is a friend's new Instago. I looked it up online, and it all met my needs, but I touched it myself and found various strength problems, which I couldn't consider before upgrading. First of all, its calorific value is amazing and very hot. Secondly, its picture quality is very poor. This is conceivable, after all, such a small machine.

Last but not least, its frame-by-frame function, shooting logic is not to take photos and connect them into videos, but to take videos and then quickly put them into high-speed videos. Can you imagine that you recorded a frame-by-frame video of several gigabytes and played it for dozens of seconds? The roughness of the algorithm is very exaggerated.

conclusion

After repeated tests, I filmed it for several days with no response scheme, and finally the funny thing came. I tried shooting with my mobile phone for a day, and then I overturned all the previous plans. We misunderstood the mobile phone, and it still smells good.

First of all, the mobile phone has the advantage of convenient fixed location, and the picture quality is second only to that of the non-reverse, so it is superior to other devices because of its good optimization. Secondly, the shooting time is short and the heat is high. Who told you that? In fact, the algorithm of mobile phone shooting frame by frame is very reasonable. He takes a picture every once in a while, and with the increase of your total shooting time, the interval of taking pictures will be lengthened.

And delete the useless photos in front. As a result, after I shot it frame by frame for three or four hours, my mobile phone didn't heat up and there was little video material. One thing that must be added here is motivation. When the phone is shooting, the screen is long and bright. If it is not plugged in, it will still shorten the shooting time. Never mind, then let's plug it in. Anyway, do you still want to go out and shoot?

So, the same conclusion, use a mobile phone. It is best to use iphone, because the algorithm is better.