Why do directors like to use slow motion when fighting in action movies nowadays?

A fight is actually very boring if it is shot by ordinary lens, because it is not a real fight after all, but a performance. However, if you use slow motion and moving shooting techniques to exaggerate the scene effect, you can make the picture more cool and viewable. Especially in the present fighting scene, compared with the effect of relying on the truth in the past when the technology is backward, now the fake fighting depends on the technology.

Slow-motion should be few and precise. If it is used too much, it will be counterproductive and affect the impression if the timing is not appropriate. Nowadays, many directors use a lot of slow motion in pursuit of cool and beautiful pictures, which is quite disgusting. To be honest, increasing the visibility of the picture by piling up slow motion can only be said that the director is not skilled enough.

this means the same thing as the close-up of a bunch of stars. Is it interesting to watch a play or movie, which is full of cool and beautiful photos of stars from beginning to end? It's boring.