Whether the tourism association’s behavior constitutes monopolistic behavior

In order to prevent vicious competition such as zero group fees, the Tourism Association of L City in a certain province convened local travel agencies to agree on a unified quotation for tourists, and uniformly allocated rebates for scenic spots and ancient city maintenance fees based on the market share of each travel agency. Commission income.

Before the implementation of this plan, Travel Agency A proactively reported this situation to the anti-monopoly law enforcement agency and provided relevant evidence.

Which of the following judgments about this case are wrong?

A. The behavior of the tourism association is a legitimate industry self-discipline behavior

B. Since it has not yet been implemented, the behavior of the tourism association does not constitute a monopoly behavior

Answer analysis options A.B's statement is wrong.

Article 16 of the Anti-Monopoly Law stipulates that industry associations shall not organize operators in the industry to engage in monopolistic behaviors prohibited by this chapter.

Article 13, Paragraph 1 of the Law stipulates that competing operators are prohibited from entering into the following monopoly agreements:

(1) Fixing or changing commodity prices;

(2) Restrict the production quantity or sales quantity of goods;

(3) Segment the sales market or raw material procurement market;

(4) Restrict the purchase of new technologies and new equipment Or restrict the development of new technologies or products;

(5) Joint boycott of transactions;

(6) Other monopoly agreements identified by the anti-monopoly law enforcement agency of the State Council. It can be seen from this that the tourism association of L city in a certain province convened local travel agencies to agree on a unified quotation for tourists, which constituted a monopoly.