How to do well in the comprehensive examination of literature?

1. How to get high marks in literature and comprehensive geography

For literature and comprehensive geography, the change of college entrance examination is not great, and the natural disasters are deleted in the elective part, leaving the environmental protection and tourism geography part. According to the average score of college entrance examination over the years, the score of tourism geography is relatively low, and the score of environmental protection and disaster is relatively high. Therefore, this reform not only does not increase the difficulty, but reduces the time waste caused by choice to some extent. Under normal circumstances, environmental protection will become the main choice.

Compared with the original disaster, the types of questions in environmental protection are more varied, which requires more rational thinking and imagination. However, it also has many generality. Put 2 environmental protection questions and answers together, and you will find that the cases selected by many topics are very similar, for example, many topics will have pollution-centered cases. You will also find that these questions are very similar to the answers. Many questions are about reasons, hazards and solutions, and the answers also have many identical ideas and specific points. For example, measures are divided into technical measures and social measures.

2 How to answer the comprehensive questions of history

This year's reform of the comprehensive history of the college entrance examination is irrelevant, but it just deletes three optional questions that have never been studied or done. So in this article, I will comb the history learning methods and matters needing attention again for you.

Multiple-choice questions

1. Examining questions

Multiple-choice questions in history, especially college entrance examination questions, pay special attention to understanding the text, which requires us to have high reading ability. The examination of questions must be slow, so as to be "stable, accurate and ruthless". Generally speaking, when I do the problem, I strictly ask myself to review the problem and get the information of "who, when, what background, for what purpose, what I did (what I said)". Reading materials is the core of history, a discipline with strong liberal arts. Here, I advise my younger brothers and sisters not to read the options just because they don't understand the stem of the questions, otherwise they will go back to reading the questions in the fog, which will not only waste time but also disrupt the rhythm of doing the questions.

In addition, let's talk about the experience that the little historical prince got when he did the problem: We must explore the inner purpose of historical figures, not what he did, but what he wanted to do. The so-called history is mainly two aspects: human subjectivity and the objectivity of the times.

2. Exclusion

Exclusion options are excluded one by one in the order of historical inconsistency (time, sequence, etc.), subject inconsistency and scope inconsistency. Of course, in most cases, the questioner will create a fuzzy option to make you wander between the last two in order to be disgusting. In view of this situation, I personally recommend the "substitution method", that is, dry the options to see if the logic is smooth, and it works every time. In any case, it is much better than staring at two similar options.