There are two main types of illegal travel problems.

Hubei province discipline inspection commission supervision Committee party style and political style supervision room and case trial room

Key points of supervision and discipline

For various forms of public travel, we should focus on whether to use public funds and public property, and make a comprehensive judgment based on the arrangement of official trips, the effect of official activities and the impact. Change the official itinerary without authorization, take the opportunity to use public funds to travel, and use public funds to travel in disguise in the name of study and training, investigation and research, staff recuperation, and participation in investment. , should be dealt with seriously. Although public officials are not prohibited from visiting scenic spots at their own expense during non-working hours, they should be strictly required. For the behavior of "hitchhiking" by starting early and delaying to return at one's own expense, it is necessary to distinguish whether it takes up working hours, whether it is accompanied by reception, and whether it has adverse effects. And adhere to strict control and strict examination and approval supervision.

primary facts

From 20 19 12 17 to 20, Zhang, a third-level researcher in a municipal government office, led a group of 7 people and went to B city, A province on business with approval. In the meantime, Zhang shortened the four-day official trip to 1.5 days, and only used 17 in the morning to 18, and then led a team to visit the tourist attractions in C city, Province A from 18 in the afternoon to 20. After returning, Zhang reimbursed 6893 yuan for travel expenses, including 2800 yuan for round-trip air tickets, accommodation, meals and transportation subsidies during 18-20, but did not reimburse scenic spots tickets and other play expenses. In the end, Zhang was severely punished by the party, and other responsible persons were dealt with accordingly, and the relevant expenses were ordered to be refunded.

Qualitative and quantitative discipline

In this case, the qualitative analysis of Zhang et al.' s disciplinary behavior mainly considers the following aspects:

The first is to reduce official travel. As a team leader, Zhang arbitrarily compressed his official itinerary and led a team to the scenic spot. This behavior takes up the time of performing official duties normally, violates the provisions of the travel management system, disrupts the management order of government agencies and units, and changes the official itinerary to take the opportunity to travel.

The second is to reimburse travel expenses in violation of regulations. Although Zhang et al. did not reimburse the scenic spot tickets and other play expenses, during the afternoon of 18 to the 20th, they reimbursed accommodation, meals and transportation subsidies in the name of travel expenses, which violated the financial management system, squandered state assets and infringed on the integrity of their duties.

When handling this case, considering that Zhang, as a leading cadre in party member, violated the rules and regulations after the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, and changed his official itinerary during the inspection to take the opportunity to travel with public funds, he should be dealt with strictly according to the rules and regulations. In view of its active cooperation with the disciplinary review, truthful account of its disciplinary facts, and voluntary reimbursement of expenses, the above treatment was made in accordance with the provisions of Item (2) of the first paragraph of Article 105 of the Regulations on Disciplinary Actions within the Chinese Production Party.

Explain by case

Through the above-mentioned cases, the key doubts in practice are analyzed and interpreted in order to clarify the vague understanding, accurately grasp the essence and accurately deal with them qualitatively.

First, how to grasp and deal with the problem of illegal tourism?

The problem of illegal tourism corrupts the party style and political style and damages the image of the party and the government. It is one of the typical problems that violate the spirit of the eight central regulations and must be attached great importance to and resolutely corrected. At present, there are two main types of illegal travel problems. First, public funds travel, the expenses are paid by public funds in different ways. The main manifestations are: some directly use public funds or imaginary expenditures to collect public funds, and subordinate units or state-owned enterprises and institutions pay travel expenses; Some travel in disguise in the name of study and training, investigation and research, staff recuperation and investment attraction; Some take advantage of business trips to change their itinerary and travel abroad; Some travel by participating in inspection activities organized by subordinate units and state-owned enterprises and institutions. The second is to accept travel arrangements that may affect the fair execution of official duties, and the expenses shall be borne by individuals or private enterprises that manage and serve. The above two situations, whether it is public travel or accepting travel arrangements that may affect the fair execution of official duties, are violations of the integrity of duty behavior. In addition, those who use public funds to travel abroad in disguised form in the name of inspection, study, training, negotiation, investment promotion, participation, etc. should also be dealt with in accordance with relevant regulations.

Traveling with public funds in the name of various forms of official activities, or taking advantage of business trips, not only wastes public funds, but also affects the seriousness of official activities. We should focus on whether to use public funds and public property, and make a comprehensive judgment on the arrangement of official trips, the effect and influence of official activities. And deal with it seriously according to the rules and regulations. To deal with the problem of public travel, we should focus on the key links such as examination and approval decision-making, financial reimbursement, find out the facts, clarify the responsibilities, accurately handle the leaders and participants, order them to refund the relevant expenses, and investigate the responsibilities of relevant leaders as appropriate. If there are situations that should be discovered but not discovered or not handled and reported after discovery, the responsibility of relevant personnel should also be investigated as appropriate. In practice, some cadres in party member, in order to avoid supervision, do not use the public funds of their own units to pay their travel expenses, but participate in public funds tours organized by enterprises or subordinate units under their management, or illegally accept the arrangement of tourism activities such as managers and customers, and should also be strictly disciplined and accountable.

Second, how to grasp the problem of changing the official itinerary and taking the opportunity to travel?

Official travel is a serious official activity. According to the Regulations of the Party and Government Organs on Strictly Saving and Opposing Waste, the number of people, days, routes and tasks are strictly controlled, and the internal examination and approval procedures are strictly implemented. Anyone who arbitrarily changes the itinerary, time and tasks in official activities and takes the opportunity to travel, whether with public funds or at his own expense, should be prohibited; Among them, the use of public money tourism should be considered as the problem of public money tourism. If the official itinerary is changed due to temporary work adjustment or special circumstances, it should be strictly submitted for approval. In this case, we should focus on the necessity, rationality and procedural compliance of changing the official itinerary, and prevent taking the opportunity to travel in the name of tourism.

Third, how to grasp the use of non-working hours to travel at your own expense when traveling on official business?

Official travel should proceed from reality, which not only ensures the normal execution of official business, but also guarantees the cadres' right to rest. Although public officials are not prohibited from visiting scenic spots at their own expense during business trips, they should be strictly required to prevent adverse effects. In practice, whether similar behaviors violate the rules can be determined from the following aspects: First, whether the official itinerary is reasonable and compact, and those who deliberately relax the time limit or facilitate the opportunity to travel through the itinerary should be strictly investigated; The second is to see whether tourism activities affect the execution of official duties. Those who involve energy, cause official duties to fail to achieve the expected results or cause losses, and accept tourism activities that may affect the fair execution of official duties should be dealt with severely; The third is to see whether to use public funds or public property, use public funds to pay for travel expenses, use the influence of authority or position to enjoy travel concessions, free tickets and fast-track treatment, and ask the reception unit to arrange tour guides and use buses. , should be severely punished; The fourth is to see if there are any adverse effects. Even without the above-mentioned violations, if there are adverse effects in the process of traveling at one's own expense after official leisure, you should also give reminders, criticism and education, admonishing or disciplinary actions as appropriate.

Fourth, how to grasp the problem of going ahead and delaying the return of "hitchhiking" at your own expense?

In reality, some public officials take advantage of the opportunity of official travel to "hitchhike" at their own expense, that is, arrive in advance to travel by plane, or stay at their own expense after official travel. On the surface, they have neither affected their official duties nor used public funds. In fact, they still take advantage of the convenience of official travel, affecting the seriousness of official activities, disrupting the normal management order of the unit, and easily having a negative impact on society. For self-funded hitchhiking, it is necessary to distinguish whether it takes up working hours, whether it is accompanied by reception, and whether it causes adverse effects. Adhere to the principle of strict control and strict examination and approval by the competent authorities. During the "hitchhiking" tour, those who occupy working hours, reimburse accommodation, food subsidies, transportation subsidies and other expenses unrelated to official travel, and use public property shall be deemed as free travel or other illegal acts and dealt with severely. If the examination and approval supervision is not strict, resulting in adverse effects or disciplinary action, the leadership responsibility of the directly responsible person and relevant leaders shall be investigated as appropriate.