Civilization 50,000 gold oil route introduction

The beautiful new world has changed more or less in many aspects, although some changes are not big, but the impact on gameplay is huge. Recently, some players have developed a panacea route, which novice players can refer to.

Tiger balm route guide

Let me talk about the policy changes brought by bnw.

The first is tradition. The tradition seems to have changed little, but due to the change of some game mechanism, that is, undeclared friends can't trade in cash, the tradition is actually quite different from gk. In gk, the two ancient farming policies-tradition and autonomy-have their own advantages in the early stage: in order to quickly form the state of four cities, the traditional early stage had to invest a lot of money to emigrate, but on the contrary, the capital did not have the demand for rigid hammer immigration, and might be hammered 1-2, but it would not be in the state of hammer immigration for a long time like an independent capital, so the advantage of the traditional early stage was the hammer of the capital. In any case, although the autonomous capital needs constant hammer immigration, there is no rigid monetary cost for autonomy. Therefore, the advantage of autonomy in the early stage lies more in the money that can be freely controlled.

But in bnw, because undeclared friends can't trade in cash, the tradition has actually been cut down a lot, and it is not as stable as before.

So, what about autonomy?

As we all know, in gk, among the three ancient trees, the closing of tradition and honor is their own signboard, while the closing of independence is relatively thin: after all, it increases the threshold for sending great men back to their own great men.

However, at the same time, almost no independent sub-policy has a good result. In this case, the value of each policy is not small, but it is relatively weak. Autonomy is the only policy tree that will be confused with other policy trees in the early stage of non-cultural victory. And the most common mashup is: traditional open door-self-mashup piety. In the past, due to the conflict between piety and reason, the cost and limitation of this kind of mixed autonomy are very great: open reason to abolish the policy in piety, or directly transform piety into dictatorship.

In bnw, due to the great changes in religious policies, especially after the conflict between religious absence and rationality, misfits' mashup style has undoubtedly gained a new life.

Then, the keynote of the so-called tiger balm policy line can basically be confirmed as piety+autonomy.

So, after talking about autonomy, I want to talk about piety. As we all know, bnw's religious belief in black technology is very powerful, but the reform of religious belief has a great influence on its national strength. So I came up with the idea of waiting for ai to wash. Moreover, after a small-scale experiment, lying down and waiting for washing has certain practicability and operation space at present.

Of course, we can't lie down and wash for the sake of religious reform. After all, it depends on the situation of other ai.

Civilization 5 is actually like eight people playing Mario Kart. There are two ways to win: 1, run fast by yourself, play slippery by yourself, and make your farming better than ai through excellent technology, calculation and micro-operation. But this method is very laborious, requires a lot of calculation and planning, and is actually very unfriendly to players. 2, racing, we can run faster than ai. So we need to find the weakness of ai and give ai some color to see.

In fact, what's the point of piety, whether to lie down and believe in religion or create a teaching reform by yourself, is actually such a situation: look at Ai. For example, four out of seven ai's have chosen all the good black technologies (we all know how fast the ai with faith can be transformed), so just lie down and wait for a soldier to explode. Four of the seven AIs beg for death and open their faith, which leads to weak national strength, so you should enjoy the process of picking mushrooms.

And when most ai is traditional/independent/noble, what are you waiting for? . . . Put the right amount of policy points on independent reform. How can I put it? There is no harm in the later reform except that it may not grab a good creed, because many good reform creeds belong to the later profit-seeking type, such as buying a scientific research building by faith. Therefore, when most ai choose independent traditional honor, if they independently enhance their national strength and then carry out reforms, the benefits will be considerable.

Let me talk about my thoughts first. This goal is a panacea that can deal with most situations.

The three main points are: the size of the back garden, the early war and the maximization of smiling faces.

When the back garden is big enough, I think the explosion shop is the best solution. When there is near ai, a large number of violent wars in the early days are still simple but efficient means to strengthen oneself and weaken ai. Maximizing a smiling face requires no words.

As a result, a new policy framework has emerged.

This is the basic framework of the general petroleum system, basically giving up the medieval policy tree and opening the door at most. Before rationality, there will still be some remaining policies. These redundant policies just need to see ai and maps play their role.

As you can see, I didn't put autonomous left two in this basic skeleton. Earlier bar friends should know that I have always been an independent left-hander, and I am a guy who likes immigration overflow hammer very much. Even now, I still believe that independent left-handedness is the most potential policy in ancient times, if circumstances permit. But this is bnw after all. I will not hesitate to choose the second place with a certain garden in the picture, but the value of this policy is debatable in the early war of independence and a small number of self-built cities. For example, when rush laid 2-3 cities in the early stage and then 3-4 cities, there were only 3-4 self-produced immigrants, so the benefits brought by this policy were 1 immigrant (106 hammers), 3-4 immigrants +50% hammers, and temporarily it was about 105 hammers (. In this case, the profit of the independent left second is 2 1 1-246. Compare with another hammer-saving policy: open the door sincerely, save half the size of temples in each city, * * * 70 hammers, and earn 490-560 hammers in 7-8 cities. Of course, considering that the actual value of immigrants is higher than that of temples, and this policy has indeed brought about the acceleration of immigrants, and this acceleration is also profitable, collective rule is still a very strong policy. In the absence of ai near the point and the early war, I will still choose. But whether this policy is necessary depends on the number of immigrants. I believe everyone has a steelyard in their heart.