Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Travel guide - Begging::: The current situation of China’s financial products~~! ! ! !

Begging::: The current situation of China’s financial products~~! ! ! !

1. Current Development Status of China’s Financial Services Industry

In recent years, with the continuous deepening of financial reform and opening up, the market environment faced by my country’s financial industry has been greatly improved, especially Since the Southeast Asian financial crisis in 1997, governments at all levels have placed financial security and steady development in a very important position, adopted a number of management measures, strengthened their own construction, and prevented financial risks, and have made great progress. However, after joining the WTO and foreign financial institutions entering the Chinese market, the pressure on various sectors of my country's financial industry will still be very high, and the current development situation is not optimistic. Below we will talk about the development status of my country's banking industry (mainly commercial banks), insurance industry and securities industry respectively.

(1) Banking Industry

At present, my country's commercial banking market is basically divided between the four major state-owned commercial banks. The degree of industry monopoly is quite high, and its business is mainly concentrated in traditional depository banks. , loan, remittance banking business and foreign exchange business, etc., and rarely or not operate all investment banking businesses, such as financial leasing business, insurance business, trust business, property consulting and consulting business and tourism advertising business, etc. These restrictions on business scope have affected the profitability and financial instrument innovation capabilities of my country's state-owned commercial banks. They have seriously insufficient capital and endogenous constraints on their lending capabilities. Due to poor performance of state-owned banks, there is great pressure to digest their own non-performing assets, and they are unable to replenish funds with operating profits. Therefore, non-performing assets are increasingly accumulating, resulting in the asset adequacy ratio of some state-owned banks failing to meet the 8% requirement stipulated in the Basel Accord. Because commercial banks have low profitability and low asset utilization efficiency, they have a large number of bad debts and doubtful debts. All these will put state-owned commercial banks at a disadvantage in competition with foreign banks.

(2) Insurance Industry

Over the past two decades, China’s insurance industry has developed rapidly with an average annual growth rate of 39.6%, achieving the first premium income of 50 billion yuan. It took 15 years, but it only took 3 years to achieve the second 50 billion yuan (see Figure 1-1, Figure 1-2). By the end of 2000, premium income reached 159.59 billion yuan. At the same time, insurance market entities are becoming increasingly diversified. Currently, there are 40 insurance companies in the country. An insurance market pattern with state-owned insurance companies and joint-stock insurance companies as the mainstay, Chinese and foreign insurance companies coexisting, and competition among multiple insurance companies has initially taken shape. However, China's insurance industry still has a series of problems, such as poor insurance company strength, few channels for using funds (the insurance industry's income is still dominated by premium surplus), low efficiency and operating technology, and poor service levels. Adapt to competition, etc. Therefore, once our insurance companies truly compete with foreign insurance institutions, the insurance industry will face a great impact.

Figure 1 my country’s premium income trend chart from 1989 to 2000

Figure 2 my country’s premium income growth trend chart from 1989 to 2000

(3) Securities Industry

my country’s securities industry started in the 1980s. After the establishment of the Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges in 1990 and 1991, it has achieved considerable development after a tortuous journey. The first is the enhancement of financing capacity. The amount of financing in my country's securities market increased from 9.978 billion yuan in 1994 to 119.222 billion yuan in 2001, accounting for 11.45% of indirect financing (bank loans); secondly, as the scale of the securities market continues to grow, The stock trading volume also continued to grow. In 1993, the stock trading volume was 362.72 billion yuan. In 2000, the stock trading volume reached a peak of 6.08266 billion yuan, an increase of 16.7 times. In 2001, the number of listed companies in my country reached 1,154, with 66.3968 million investor accounts. The above data show that after 10 years of rapid development, my country's securities market has begun to take shape. However, since my country's securities industry developed under certain protection and has not fully integrated with the international market, there are still some problems for its further development:

First of all, the business scope of domestic securities institutions is narrow; The variety is single and the structure is similar. The business scope is limited to the three traditional domestic businesses of underwriting, brokerage and self-operation. Although corporate financial consulting services are also available, most of them are auxiliary means to obtain underwriting projects. The products and services provided are very similar and have little influence on financial innovation. The importance is still not fully appreciated.

Secondly, financing channels are not smooth and there are not many listed securities companies. There are three channels: inter-bank lending, treasury bond repurchase and capital increase and share expansion, and financing focuses on short-term financing and lacks long-term financing channels that are urgently needed for the development of securities companies.

Third, capital operation efficiency is poor.

Fourth, the asset management business of securities firms is in chaos.

Fifth, the income from securities brokerage business declined.

These all show that New China’s securities industry, which has only more than 20 years of growth history, will face huge realistic pressure when competing with foreign securities companies that have experienced more than a hundred years of capital market tempering and are strong.

2. Comparison of the development of Chinese and foreign financial service industries

In November 2001, China finally entered the WTO. It will become an inevitable trend for Chinese and foreign financial institutions to compete on the same stage. my country's financial industry must To occupy a place in this new competition, one must compare and analyze each other's strengths and weaknesses, judge one's own living environment, and finally propose one's own strategic plan.

(1) Banking industry

1. Comparison of operating scale

To measure the operating scale of a comprehensive commercial bank, it mainly includes sub-indicators such as total assets, first-tier capital, number of branches, and cross-border operations.

Table 1 Comparison of operating scale of Chinese and foreign commercial banks (1999) Unit: 100 million US dollars

Total assets

Tier 1 capital

Branch Number of institutions

Multinational operations

Industrial and Commercial Bank of China

4275.46

219.19

Domestic branches There are many institutions

Multi-national operations are in the initial stage

Agricultural Bank of China

2442.93

162.66

There are many domestic branches

Transnational operations are in the initial stage

China Construction Bank

2658.45

131.96

< p>Many domestic branches

Transnational operations are in the initial stage

Bank of China

3162.14

152.70

Global Institutional Layout

Global Bank

Citibank

7169.37

476.99

Global Institutional Layout

Global Bank

Bank of America

6325.74

381.76

Global Institutional Layout

Global Bank

Deutsche Bank

8437.61

174.18

Global institutional layout

Global bank

Barclays

3988.25

140.55

p>

Global Institutional Layout

Global Banks

Source: Zhang Fanglong, Ruan Banying: "Profit Comparison of Chinese and Foreign Commercial Banks and Strategies for WTO Entry", "Modern Commercial Banks" "Guide", Issue 1, 2001; Kong Yong and Ma Gengzhi, "Overview of the Assets, Liabilities and Financial Status of the World's 30 Banks", China Economic Press, 1996 edition.

As can be seen from Table 1, in terms of total assets and primary capital sources, my country’s four major state-owned commercial banks are not inferior to international multinational commercial banks and have entered the ranks of the world’s largest banks. However, from the perspective of the number of branches and cross-border operations, except for the Bank of China, which has many branches at home and abroad and has begun to take on certain characteristics of a global bank, the other three state-owned commercial banks have a large number of branches, but their cross-border operations are poor. It’s just begun. Therefore, from the analysis of operating scale indicators, the biggest gap between my country's state-owned commercial banks and foreign comprehensive banks is reflected in deficiencies in global branch layout and lagging cross-border operations.

2. Comparison of business functions

The difference in business functions between my country's state-owned commercial banks and foreign banks is mainly reflected in the restrictions imposed by the regulatory authorities on mixed operations and separate operations (see Table 2). The United Kingdom, Japan and the United States have revised relevant laws in 1986, 1992 and 1999 respectively, and finally abolished the legal obstacles to mixed operations. my country's "Commercial Banking Law" strictly prohibits commercial banks from engaging in non-banking businesses such as securities investment.

Table 2 Comparison of Chinese and Foreign Commercial Banking Business

Commercial Banking Business

Investment Banking Business

Insurance Business

Legislative restrictions by the authorities

ICBC

Deposits, loans, foreign exchange and other business functions are complete

ICEA

None

Separate operations

Agricultural Bank of China

Deposits, loans, foreign exchange and other business functions are complete

None

None

Business operations

Construction Bank

Deposits, loans, foreign exchange and other business functions are complete

CICC

None

Separate operations

Bank of China

Deposits, loans, foreign exchange and other business functions are complete

BOCI

None

Separate operations

Citibank

Deposits, loans, foreign exchange and other business functions are complete

Comprehensive investment banking business

Yes

Restrictions were lifted in 1999

Deutsche Bank

Deposits, loans, foreign exchange and other business functions are fully functional

Universal bank

Yes

Comprehensive mixed operation

Barclays Bank

Deposits, loans and foreign exchange and other business functions are complete

Comprehensive investment banking business

Yes

Restrictions were lifted in 1992

In recent years, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, China Construction Bank and Bank of China have begun to bypass legal restrictions and establish investment banking institutions through domestic and overseas acquisitions and joint ventures. Launched investment banking business and achieved remarkable results. However, domestic branches are not yet allowed to engage in primary and secondary securities market business. Therefore, the comprehensive and versatile business functions are important factors in forming the strong competitiveness of foreign commercial banks.

3. Comparison of financial innovation

Financial innovation includes three major aspects: institutional innovation, mechanism innovation and business innovation. Since large foreign-funded banks are located in market economy countries, there is no problem of institutional innovation and mechanism innovation. Therefore, the comparison of financial innovation is limited to business innovation.

As can be seen from Table 3, the business innovation of my country's state-owned commercial banks is limited to the traditional deposit, loan and foreign exchange business. Most of the business innovations still draw on the products of foreign commercial banks from the 1960s to the 1980s, and the degree of marketization is high. , High-tech products such as futures, options, interest rate swaps, consumer loan securitization, derivative financial product transactions, etc. have not yet been launched in our country. It can be seen that the competitiveness of my country's state-owned commercial banks in new product fields and cross-border operations is very weak.

Table 3 Comparison of business innovations of Chinese and foreign commercial banks

Business innovations of Chinese state-owned commercial banks

Business innovations of foreign commercial banks

Integrated accounts< /p>

Bank-securities transfer

Floating rate loan

Bill financing

Electronic banking

Revolving loan

Online settlement

Consumer credit

Negotiable certificate of deposit

Negotiable payment account

Floating rate notes and Eurobonds< /p>

Futures trading

Electronic banking

Mutual funds

Consumer loan securitization

Interest rate swaps

SWIFT trading system

Options trading

Derivative financial product trading

4. Comparison of development strategies

Development strategy is a strategic measure for a commercial bank to achieve sustainable development. Foreign commercial banks attach great importance to development strategies and pay great attention to maintaining the relative stability of development strategies and the consistency of development goals (see Table 4).

Table 4 Comparison of development strategies of Chinese and foreign commercial banks

Development strategies of Chinese state-owned commercial banks

Development strategies of large foreign multinational banks

Expansion , extensive management, undifferentiated marketing, both policy and profitability, and resource planning and allocation as the main focus.

Differentiation strategy, key focus strategy, transnational business strategy, profit maximization strategy, and resource allocation optimization strategy.

5. Comparison of other competitiveness projects

(1) In terms of liquidity, the loan-to-deposit ratio of the Japanese banking industry is 93. 73%, which is 9.14 percentage points higher than that of our country. The United States is 87.97%, which is basically the same as my country. From the perspective of deposit-to-loan ratio, the liquidity of the U.S. banking industry is not higher than the average level of my country's banking industry, but this does not mean that it is not as good as ours in terms of liquidity, because my country's four major banks have a high proportion of non-performing assets and are responsible for A large part of the "policy loans" may not be able to be recovered immediately. In Europe, its loan-to-deposit ratio reached 127.57%, which is much higher than the level of my country's banking industry in the same period.

(2) In terms of profitability, the asset profit rate of the Japanese banking industry is -1.2%, 1.21 percentage points lower than the 0.09% of my country's four major banks, and the profit growth rate is negative, at -30.59% , while during the same period, my country's state-owned commercial banks were -36.26%. The asset profit rate is 1.66% in the United States and 0.63% in Europe, both of which are higher than those in my country.

(3) In terms of asset quality, as shown in Table 5, Japan's bad debt and delinquent loan rates are 3.13655% and 0.04385%, which are similar to the situation in my country, while the United States is relatively low in this regard.

(4) In terms of development capabilities, the proportion of self-owned capital of Japanese banks is relatively high, reaching 11.6%, while that of the United States is 8.72%. Compared with my country’s domestic commercial banks, the two are not much different, but my country's state-owned commercial banks do not have a normal capital replenishment mechanism, and there is a certain gap between them and the United States and Japan in this regard.

Table 5 International Comparison of Bank Asset Quality

Item

Ratio

Japan

(10 banks in total )(%)

United States

(%)

Europe

(%)

Liquidity

Liquidity ratio

NA

NA

NA

Loans and deposits

97 .93

87.93

127.57

Profitability

Profit from assets

-1.12

1.66

0.63

Capital Profit

NA

19.53

NA

Profit growth

NA

NA

-25.54

Per capita profit

NA

55578US$

NA

Interest Recovery

NA

NA

99.58

Adequate interest payable

NA

NA

35.6

Asset Quality

Overdue Loans

1.0664

1.26

NA

Sluggish Loans

3.13655

0.33

NA

Bad debt loan

1.04385

p>

0.64

NA

Risk asset offset

95.9202

167.76

NA

Risk-weighted asset offset

73.3144

NA

NA

Development capabilities

Capital adequacy ratio

11.6

8.72

NA

Deposit growth

p>

-5.29

7.06

-3.94

Loan growth

-2.61

8.27

15.97

(2) Insurance Industry

With China’s accession to the WTO, my country’s insurance industry will face a A more open and fierce competition environment will also face a number of foreign insurance giants who are eyeing them. What is the gap between China's insurance industry and foreign insurance industry? Below we will compare the insurance industry from five aspects: market size, insurance depth and density, asset size, market concentration rate, and financing channels.

1. Comparison of market size

As can be seen from Table 6, world premium income is mainly concentrated in developed countries. In other words, developed countries occupy a major position in the world insurance market. Since my country's insurance industry resumed business, although it has developed rapidly, the total scale is still small. In 1999, premium income ranked only 16th in the world, with a market share of only 0.72%.

Table 6 Comparison of premium income between my country and other major countries in 1999

Country

Premium income (millions of US dollars)

Percentage World market share (%)

World ranking

United States

795188

34.22

1

Japan

494885

21.29

2

UK

204893

8.82

3

Germany

138829

5.97

4

France

123113

5.3

5

Italy

66649

2.87

6

South Korea

47929

2.06

7

Canada

41882

1.8

8

Australia

38712

1.67

9

Netherlands

37985

1.63

10

China

16830

0.72

16

Brazil

11203

0.48

21

India

8391

0.36

23

Source: Sigma No. 9, 2000.

2. Comparison of insurance penetration and insurance density

Insurance penetration and insurance density are two important indicators to measure the development of a country's insurance industry. Premium density refers to the per capita premium amount, and insurance penetration refers to the proportion of insurance revenue in GDP. If the per capita premium of a country is higher and the proportion of insurance revenue in GDP is greater, it means that the country's insurance industry is relatively more developed. In 1999, in terms of insurance density, my country's insurance density was only US$13.3 per person, ranking 73rd in the world. The insurance penetration is only 1.63, of which the property and casualty insurance penetration is 0.61 and the life insurance penetration is 1.02. Overall, it ranks 58th in the world, far behind developed countries such as the United Kingdom and the United States, and even behind Brazil (51st) and India (52nd). name). From Table 2.2-2 and 2.2-3, we can see the gap between my country and other countries.

Table 7 Comparison of insurance density between my country and other major countries in 1999

Country

Switzerland

Japan

United Kingdom

United States

Ireland

Netherlands

Finland

Ranking

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Insurance density

4642.7

3908.9

3244.3

2921.1

2454.7

2404.7

2212.6

Country

France

Denmark

Australia

Brazil

China

India

Ranking

8

9

10

50

73

79

Insurance density

2080.9

2037.4

2017.3

68.6

13.3

8.5

Table 8 Insurance penetration in my country and other major countries in 1999 Comparison table

Countries

South Africa

United Kingdom

Switzerland

South Korea

Japan

Ireland

Australia

Ranking

1

2

3

p>

4

5

6

7

Insurance depth (%)

16.54

13.35

12.84

12.84

11.17

9.83

9.82

p>

Country

Netherlands

Finland

United States

Brazil

India

China

Ranking

8

9

10

50

52

58

Insurance depth (%)

9.65

8.88

8.55

2.01

1.93

1.63

3. Comparison of asset size

China Life Insurance Company and People's Insurance Company of China are the largest life insurance companies and property insurance companies in my country respectively. However, in terms of total assets, the asset scale of these two companies is relatively small. The total assets of the two companies are only 16.6% of the total assets of the world's 25th largest insurance company. In terms of asset profit, the China Life Insurance Company's asset profit rate is 0.47%, and the People's Insurance Company of China's asset profit rate is 1.78%. Among the world's top 20 insurance companies, the asset profit rate with the lowest rate is 4%. All these indicate that my country’s insurance companies have high operating costs and low market competitiveness (see Table 9).

Table 9 Comparison of the asset strength of the world's top 10 insurance companies and Chinese insurance companies in 1998

Ranking

Company (Country)

Assets

Growth rate (%)

Owners

Equity

Net profit

Profit rate on assets< /p>

1

AXA (France)

449566

5

16634

52683

11.72

2

Allianz Group (Germany)

401406

45

26041

46805

11.66

3

Nippon Life (Japan)

374801

1

8501

51128

13.64

4

Zenkyoren&prefectrual Ins.Federation (Japan)

297477

3

3990

46154

15.52

5

5 p>

Dai-ichi Mutual Life (Japan)

261164

4

5198

35030

< p>13.41

6

AIG (US)

133673

17

30123

24879

10.65

7

Metropolitan Life Insurance (USA)

215346

6< /p>

14367

11503

5.34

8

Sumitomo Life (Japan)

212200

2

4411

29320

13.82

9

Zurich Financial Services (Switzerland)

205963

11

11994

25221

12.24

10

Prudential Group (UK)

196536

10

5443

18782

9.56

People's Insurance Company of China

5806

334.9

103.3

1.78

China Life Insurance Company

11675

622.7

54.7

0.47

China Life+ PICC

17481

957.6

957.6

0.90

Data source: (1) 2000 1 Issue 173 of "Insurance Information" of the month. The rankings in this table are based on assets and determined according to Dow Jones and Isis.

Amounts are expressed in millions of U.S. dollars, and the exchange rate is based on the exchange rate on December 31, 1998. Growth rates are calculated in national currencies.

(2) "China Insurance Yearbook" 1999.

4. Comparison of market concentration rates

Currently, there are only 40 insurance companies in my country (including 5 wholly owned insurance companies, 9 joint-stock insurance companies, 13 Sino-foreign joint venture insurance companies, and 13 foreign-funded insurance companies), and There are 110 insurance companies in Japan, more than 5,000 insurance companies in the United States in the 1980s, and more than 200 insurance companies in Hong Kong. The number of insurance institutions in China is too small, resulting in a high concentration rate in the insurance market and serious monopoly operations (see Table 10).

As can be seen from the table below, countries with relatively developed insurance industries generally have smaller market concentration rates. For example, the market share of the top five property insurance companies in the United States in 1998 was only 30.16%, and the market share of the top five life insurance companies in Japan was only 60.4%. This is because in countries with relatively developed insurance industries, there are fewer barriers to entry into the insurance market. It is relatively easy to set up an insurance company, so there are many insurance companies and competition is fierce. Make the entire market less concentrated.

In our country, due to the long-term implementation of the plan