Is canon 85 1.4 better than 70 200 f2.8 in background blur?

Of course, it's not as good as 70-200f2.8, that's for sure. The longer the focal length, the better the background blur. There is no comparison between 85 focal length and 200 focal length. If you use 70-200f2.8 when shooting portraits, the focal length is always placed at 200 ends. Whether it is a large photo, a half-length photo or a full-length photo, the background blur effect is very good, which has the effect of an air cutting machine. However, if 85- 1.4 is used, the aperture is fully open, and the background blur effect is not as good as 70200, because the focal length is short. Try it if you don't believe me. Send some photos I took with 70200:

85mmF 1.4 is a new breed of cattle, which supplements the gap between 85mm 1.8 and 1.2. Which lens is more blurred than 70-200mm? Let me give you my opinion.

In fact, in my opinion, the gap between 85 and 70-200 is not big, and the key is usefulness. 85mmF 1.4 (with anti-shake) is a professional portrait zoom, and 70-200mm is a professional portrait zoom. Generally speaking, 85mm is still blurry than 70-200 mm, because its aperture is larger than 70-200mm.

In the performance of blurred background, the blur of 85mm is harder than that of 70-200mm, in other words, 85mm is sharper and 70-200 is softer! 85mm can better reflect the separation between characters and background, and 70-200mm may not be as good as 85. After all, it's just a shot, and the cost performance is still relatively high.

The weight of the two lenses is also a big problem. 85 is light, 70-200, but convenient. There are 70-200 zoom focal lengths to choose from, and 85mm can only be shot on foot. The degree of ambiguity has already been mentioned, so the subject should consider it for himself!

Is canon 85 1.4 better than 70 200 f2.8 in background blur? We can really feel the difference between Jiao Wai 85 1.4 and 70-200 in our daily shooting. What is the reason? Let's talk about it together

These two shots are used by many friends to take portraits. When shooting portraits, we will make good use of the soft background produced by the lens to express the theme.

The background is blurred, and the aperture is only one aspect of the influence.

Below I will communicate with you from several aspects of background blur.

1, aperture

We know that when shooting, the larger the aperture value, the more blurred the background will be, which is the way we often express ambiguity.

2. focal length.

The focal length is also a main factor of blurring, because too large a zoom will produce a sense of oppression and will blur the background of the picture. This is why in some cases, the ratio of 70 200 to 85 1.4 is blurred in the background.

3. Shooting distance.

Sometimes if we shoot the subject at a closer distance, the closer the background, the better. The farther the distance, the stronger the blur effect.

In fact, the above factors that affect the blur work together in our shooting. Only by comprehensive application properly can we shoot a suitable work with a beautiful blurred background.

The above is my opinion, welcome to communicate.

Sword dance images, western photographers, welcome to pay attention.

The blur ability of Canon 85/ 1.4 is definitely better than that of 70-200/2.8 by simple comparison. After all, the aperture is two steps larger, which cannot be exceeded by 200 focal lengths alone. Moreover, as far as blur effect is concerned, the near 85 fixed focus not only has good blur effect, but also has higher definition, and the Jiao Wai is softer and clearer. If the fixed focus head can't spell the zoom head, it's rotten.

First of all, we must understand what the "good" of background blur means.

The "good" of background blur asked by the subject may be the "depth" of the depth of field of these two lenses under different apertures and focal lengths, that is, the ability of background blur (the contrast ability between actual and actual pictures); You can also ask the defocusing effect of the background of two lenses at different apertures and focal lengths, that is, the visual effect of secondary divergence.

There are many factors that affect the depth of field of a photo. Generally speaking, with the same aperture, the longer the focal length of the lens, the shallower the depth of field, and the larger the aperture of the lens with the same focal length, the shallower the depth of field, and vice versa.

What affects the blurred (visual) effect of the photo background is closely related to the lens group design, lens group structure, lens material, the number and shape of aperture blades and so on.

As far as the actual use effect is concerned, the background blur ability and blur (visual) effect of Canon's 85mm 1.4 fixed-focus lens at the maximum aperture are better than those of Canon's 70-200mm 2.8 zoom lens at the maximum aperture at the 200mm end.

I think 85 1.4 is better than 70 200 in background blur ability.

The fixed-focus lens of 85 1.4 has a larger aperture and the focal length of 85 is not long, so the background blur will be softer and more dreamy when shooting. The sharpness of fixed focus is also higher, which is very suitable for portrait shooting.

In addition to 70 200, it is undeniable that this long zoom of Dayuanyuan is also the best lens for taking portraits in Dayuanyuan. Although its aperture is only 2.8, its cutting ability is very strong, and the degree of blurring at 200 ends is also good. But compared with 85, it is a bit insufficient.

Subtitle 1 "Look at the cow in the distance and change it into a PK portrait"

Subtitle 2 "Difference between Portrait Lens and Universal Telescopic Zoom Head"

Subtitle 3 "Where is the top shot of 85 portraits?"

85mmf 1.4 and 70200f2.8 are completely different design directions. 85mmf 1.4 is specially designed for portraits. This kind of lens tends to relax the flatness of the image field, highlight the saturation of color transmission, reduce bilinear in the suburbs, and require moderate contrast. 70200f.8 is an important universal telescopic zoom head, which can do anything. On the other hand, it almost means anything. The design of zoom head is mainly based on the uniformity of full focal length quality, supplemented by Jiao Wai, angular loss and other characteristics.

Take portraits for example. The aperture of the zoom head is too small, which is only f2.8 in the portrait photography focal length of 85- 135 mm, and when the aperture of the zoom head is fully opened, the resolution, sharpness and light loss of the four corners are not ideal. But the quality of 85mmf 1.4 is definitely higher than that of 70200 when the aperture is also set to f2.8.

Note that the gap between the two is not only a matter of hard indicators such as resolution and contrast. Portrait photography, people 85 must exist. Shooting portrait subjects will naturally have more feelings in image processing than 70200 as a general lens. For example, the top-class 85 fixed focus is definitely better than the top-class 70200 zoom lens in skin color, texture and performance, because the micro-contrast reproduction ability of the former is obviously better. This point can not be solved simply by looking at the resolution of black and white line evaluation taken online, nor can it be fully understood by the flagship store in a few minutes. It takes a period of shooting experience to get a summary.

If we must simply compare the blur ability of the two, then the 70200 lens can only use f2.8 with 200 focal length, and the pk85 lens can only use df 1.4. But I want to emphasize that at this time, the 200 focal length is not suitable for taking pictures. So who is more powerful than the 70200' s 200f2.8 fully open and 85f 1.4 fully open? Or the 85 lens is dominant. Contrast, anti-glare and sharpness are all better.

When the pure blurring effect of 200 terminals is good, 200/2.8 = 71.43,85/1.4 = 60.71. The larger the number, the stronger the fuzzy ability. However, the photographer is not simply blurred and out of focus. . It's all the point.

Everyone's very biased understanding has brought a large aperture and blurring ability. The theme of 200-end proximity can blur any background, making up for the deficiency of 2.8 and even surpassing it. Two different shots don't make much sense Both of them are good shots for taking portraits, and the blurring ability of 85-end is not as good as that of 200-end. The design of large aperture makes up for this deficiency, but the shortcomings of full aperture are still great, so the 200 head has natural advantages. For example, just like a car, 200 is a naturally aspirated engine, and 85 power is obviously not good, so adding a turbocharged 1.4 large aperture has advantages and disadvantages. The following pictures were taken with Canon 70-200, thank you.

The effect of 85 1.4 is definitely better than that of 70-200, and the fixed focus lens is always better than the zoom lens. In terms of imaging quality, clarity and background smoothness, the fixed Jiao Da aperture is superior to the large zoom aperture. It's just that they use different scenes and have different volumes and weights. Which lens should I choose depending on the specific usage scene?