How to evaluate the legal column "A Line"?

The legal version of "My uncle will take care of it to the end". In the name of CCTV, it is called the universal law popularization program. In fact, it's good to talk about the law for five minutes in the 40-minute program. Many times, it is a "replay" of the plot, and most of the programs are family ethical disputes that can't be exhausted. Sometimes even because the length of the program is too late, the content of law popularization is basically simplified as: "Waiting for him/her will be legal sanctions."

I seriously doubt that China's late marriage and late childbearing are all held down by legal columns such as "first line", because no matter whether you open this column in spring, summer, autumn and winter, there is a 99% probability that you will encounter the following legal cases-such as "marital discord", "mother-in-law discord", "aunt discord", "divorce can't kill people" and "marriage can't beat parents".

After hindering the marriage process of young people, the front line now has a tendency to affect the relationship between parents. Imagine a harmonious family jumping in line between news broadcast and weather forecast. A man burst into tears in an iron cage because his wife was killed by family chores, and then his mother gave his father a meaningful look. This is not the place where people care about tomorrow's weather!

After the enthusiastic popularization of the "First Line" column group, the audience can always have the illusion that there should not be many happy couples in the country now.

The first line is said to be the first special column in China to report facts from the perspective of the rule of law. Its basic positioning is: "Based on the rule of law, look at the society." If three minutes based on the rule of law can be counted, then family ethics in society can be counted as conforming to the problem.

In fact, the best thing about "One Line" is that after the short legal popularization link is cut off at the end of the program, each issue can be regarded as a family dog blood ethics unit drama, and the story is so bizarre that film and television dramas dare not shoot it like this! When I was young, the first-line directors probably chose a manuscript in Yin Zhi and wrote an article in the story club. Otherwise, how can we find the bloodiest one from tens of thousands of news articles every day? In other words, the story comes from life, and the screenwriter of the dog blood drama is strongly required to watch all the programs of "The First Line" five or six times repeatedly, and the creative inspiration must gush out like a spring.

Of course, The First Line is really a useless legal program. Although 80% of its news is full of dog blood and silent housework, as a legal news column, First Line has truly expressed news facts objectively and popularized relevant legal knowledge rigorously and professionally.

Its broadcast at least spread the existence and importance of law to many areas where education cannot be received: for many women and children, the law will become a reliance when needed; Psychological protection for many vulnerable groups; There is also a constraint on many malicious violent elements. "What awaits him will be legal sanctions", which should not only be repeated on TV, but also be played in the audience's mind.

In fact, As a legal column, The Line is now in an awkward position in the press. People who are interested in the law are dismissive of the content they broadcast and the knowledge of popularizing the law; Most people who are interested in this program are not interested in learning legal knowledge. But in the end, I still recommend every marriageable man and woman to read the legal column "A Line", without asking for more knowledge, at least have a little awe of marriage first.