Which is recommended for taking portraits with a film camera?

What good film camera can you recommend for beginners?

Minolta X700, Canon AE-/KOOC-0/,Nikon FM2, Olympus OM-/KOOC-0/Minolta X700, fighter in the film entry machine. Born in 1982, he is probably older than all the comrades who play movies now. Cost-effective, very suitable for working-class and students, but by no means a low-end machine.

What are the recommendations for entry-level film cameras?

Canon EOSRebel2000 is 35 mm film, which is one of the best film cameras for beginners. With auto-focus function, it can be controlled manually. It is also useful for people who have basic knowledge of film cameras but want to further improve their knowledge.

Canon can be said to be the most suitable 35mm film camera for beginners, because it also has a built-in 35-zone exposure system. This will reduce your lens calibration time. In addition, 1 1 shooting mode, 7-segment autofocus and high-speed synchronization mode are provided, which can speed up uploading.

Canon AE- 135mm film camera is the best 35mm film camera. This is a single-lens reflex camera with automatic exposure monitoring function and focal plane shutter, which can shoot accurately. All lenses are compatible with any lens in Canon FD series and have the function of coupling with this specific device, so they are excellent companion cameras for still photos.

It is equipped with a Canon breech lock bracket and is compatible with Canon FL and R lenses. The camera uses a pentaprism to fix the observer, which can achieve more than 90% image capture accuracy and reflection, which is very high for any camera. It has a stop pointer and an aperture scale for viewing information.

Pentax K 1000 manual focusing film camera

Pentax is one of the most suitable film cameras for beginners. It uses 35mm film to produce high-resolution photos in k 1000 SLR function. It has simple shutter speed, aperture and focal length control. Pentax is a simple camera.

The old mage talked about Nikon Sharp, Canon Soft Light and Pentax Oil. Which do you prefer for portrait shooting?

I don't think I can reach the level of the old mage, but I am still very touched by portrait photography.

Nikon's sharpness, Canon's softness and Pentax oil have become a style of the camera brand itself. Naturally, carrots and vegetables have their own tastes. Especially Nikon and Canon, which brand of camera is more suitable for portrait shooting from the beginning?

The SLR I am using now is Canon, but Nikon was the first to see the masterpiece of SLR. At that time, college students bought a Nikon SLR, but I don't remember the specific model. The first impression of the portrait photo is how it can be so clear and clear, and it can be seen after zooming in. At that time, everyone joked that no matter how beautiful people are, they can shoot flaws.

In fact, at that time, SLR was still a new digital product, and people's pursuit of it was mainly high pixels, so Nikon's sharpness added points for itself.

However, when I started my own SLR, the price was very beautiful because it was a second-hand SLR eliminated by my colleagues. I have no choice but to use Canon 60D and begin to appreciate Canon's gentle interpretation of portraits. In fact, Canon's marketing promotion is also based on portraits, and the style of the film is more suitable for the tone of the studio and more easily welcomed by the audience. Nikon portrait film feels closer to realism.

Pentax oil, my understanding is a kind of color interpretation, just like I like the color of Fuji. The "oily" feeling of Pentax film should be said to be a taste and a texture. This kind of texture is generally not liked by girls who like Japanese, Indian and light, and it is also a minority taste. I think Pentax should shoot Tibetan portraits, and the film should give people a more tasteful, kind and vicissitudes.

So it depends on which style of portrait the photographer prefers. If your style is changeable, creative and experimental, try various brands of SLR.

Please make clear the allusions before editing the questions. It's really embarrassing to make up a puzzling sentence.

The correct legend is: "Canon is charming, Nikon is sharp and Pantex is intoxicating."

Among them, "Pantex" is the transliteration of Pentax, which is also the name of the older generation of photographers.

This allusion originated from the film age and summed up the lens characteristics of Canon, Nikon and Pentax.

Times have changed, and now Pentax is half dead, with a market share of less than 2%, and a large number of lenses are made by Longteng. It's no use flattering Pentax with such outdated jokes.

Some people even boast that "Mount Olympus" is "Leica of the East". What a ghost!

After all, the old mage is old, and after all, he has a little old vision of the movie era.

I can't agree with the level, but there are still some subtle differences between different brands of lenses. Different lens materials and different coating processes determine the color difference.

Old-fashioned optical design theory, large lens contrast. The details must be poor (for example, the old Nikon lens tends to Gao Fancha), the lens contrast is low, and the details must be excellent (for example, the Canon FD lens tends to have high details); The lens is designed to balance contrast and detail.

However, after entering the1990s, the application of simulation design in optical design is very popular. Therefore, lens convergence is a common situation in this world. Including the coating that we often say has a decisive influence on color, it is simulated in advance in the design software, and any coating you want can be used. Including temperature changes, spectral range, which can be simulated. The lens hasn't been made yet. In addition to understanding the imaging performance of the lens, the software even helps you calculate the approximate weight of the lens in the future, and even cost analysis.

Now Canon and Pentax are not necessarily Gao Fancha without Nikon, and Nikon is not necessarily without details of Canon.

Because everyone uses the same original plan. So there are fewer and fewer things that can determine the difference in lens description ability.

Tell me about my own feelings. Nikon, Canon, Pentax and Sony cameras have all been used. At first, the university used Nikon D90, which was used everywhere with a pullover lens. It turned out that Nikon was really sharp. Later, I used 70D and 6D, and gradually fell in love with the warm colors of Canon. Then I accidentally went to 6D this year and bought Sony A7R2. Sure enough, it was produced by Sony, and the photos and videos taken were even clearer than Nikon's. But then I thought about taking more portraits, so I started the 5D4 that most photographers dream of.

Each brand of such a machine camera has its own characteristics. In fact, the current retouching technology is so mature and the retouching ability is better, but it will not affect too much shooting. Camera shooting just gives you some feelings before the final work comes out.

But then again, I personally like the softness of Canon and the brilliance of Sony. Just all kinds of fun.

Canon has done a good job in marketing, but it is a little worse than Nikon in technology. Canon's definition is not enough, like a hazy layer, so it looks very soft. Nikon's definition is very high, so it looks sharp. Canon spends money on advertising marketing, while Nikon spends money on specialized research technology.

All three brands are in use, Pentax's favorite,

Hasselblad and mamia medium format were used in the early days, and 135 format was not used until the digital age. Nikon was naturally used at first, and it lasted for 10 years. Later, I liked to use Canon directly for 7 years, and later I changed the Sony micro-single for portability and focusing convenience.

The following is Canon.

Florence, Italy

Milan, Italy

4/3 is also a good choice. Olympus is also my favorite. Em 10 will always be with me. Look at its direct cinema effect.

20 19 Nha Trang, Vietnam

Only Olympus is with me most often.

In 2020, due to work needs, Sony's micro-single was added. Sony is another style. The most prominent Sony's focusing system rarely goes wrong. Basically, you can shoot with confidence.

Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge

I wish all my friends job satisfaction.

The question itself is incorrect. The original words are: Nikon Sharp, Canon charming, Pantex intoxicating. The so-called Pantek is now Pentax, mainly Nikon is Sharp and Gao Fancha, so many people say it is suitable for scenery; Canon's portraits, especially the yellow people, are really pleasing. As for Pentax, it is the most German in Japan, especially for its green performance. Speaking of the development of equipment now, Pentax really lags behind, but it cannot be denied that Pentax has made historic contributions and profound knowledge in optics. Just like Minolta, even if the brand has not been preserved for a long time, it has left many classics. In the past two years, Pentax's new 720 lens and Star Wizard are no worse than any focusing market segment of Nikon Canon, and the biggest gap is focusing. Good control and good picture quality. Nova Elf is the first star head with electric aperture. Pentax is backward because it can't give up the original bayonet. Unlike canon, I dare not let go of the original bayonet. It always carries a heavy load. I hope Pentax can stand up and return to the front line this time!

Canon is not enterprising and is ready to change doors.

I don't deserve to be an old mage. Tell me about my experience! Canon is still the first choice for portrait shooting, and there is nothing to say about the color and imaging quality of the picture. After the wedding dress is controlled, it can be straight out. This photo was taken by 5D3+ Sigma 85 1.4.

Nikon or Canon for portrait shooting?

Question 1: Is it better to shoot portraits with Canon SLR or scenery? By the way, introduce Nikon. Canon and Nikon are both excellent, but the emphasis is different. Canon is fast and has obvious advantages over Nikon in telephoto field, which depends on the fact that Canon's body aperture is larger than Nikon's, and the research and development potential of large aperture lens is greater, more convenient and lower in cost. Canon's super zoom has reached 1200mm, while Nikon has developed to 600mm, and the effect is not as good as Canon's 600mm. In terms of wide angle, Nikon has a slight advantage over Canon in imaging clarity. In terms of hue, Canon is precise and natural warm, while Nikon is rich in cool. Therefore, Canon is used for portrait shooting and Nikon is used for landscape shooting. Canon is used for sharpness, Nikon is used for sharpness, or each has its own emphasis. Because Canon is fast, sports reporters generally use Canon, which is the white cannon next to the sports ground that everyone sees. But Canon's low-end products can be said to be cheaper, but not as kind as Nikon, especially the lens. Canon's dog head can be like a dog, Nikon's dog head can be used, but the body is not much better. It can be said that the low-end Nikon is better than the high-end Canon, which depends on your own choice. If you play with film, I will tell you without hesitation: use Nikon. If you ask about digital SLR, I will say: almost. It is more cost-effective to use Nikon at the entry level. After all, SLR is to play with the lens. Am I objective when I speak with Canon?

Tell me a budget and I'll recommend it to you. I don't look at the parameter recommendation provided online, but I recommend it with experience. Don't spray it without touching it!

Question 2: Shooting landscapes, people, SLR, Nikon or Canon, questioning Nikon's land, the answer is of course Nikon's hunger.

But taking portraits, Canon's high-end is very good ~

85mmf 1.2L is a good thing that Nikon doesn't have ~

If recommended, Nikon d90 18- 105 sets+50mMF/1.8d.

Or, canon 40D 17-85 sets+50mmf/1.8ii.

Question 3: Is it better to take a portrait as Canon or Nikon? No one is better than Canon or Nikon. Canon is softer and Nikon is sharper, but Nikon's skin is rough when released directly. But it will be fine after the later stage. And sharp photos are more emotional.

Quan Huafu is better or half a frame is better. Obviously, Quan Huafu is good. Fortunately, many people will tell you that the image quality is better, but many people understand that the better image quality is determined by the hardware of the camera. In fact, Quan Huafu's advantage lies in the same framework. For example, if I take a bust, the image quality in Quan Huafu is better with a large aperture, because for example, for lenses with apertures of 50mm and 1.8, for a half-frame Canon, it is 80mm and f 1.8, and for Nikon, it is 75mm and 1.8. From the perspective of depth of field, Quan Huafu's is better. In other words, Quan Huafu can give full play to the performance of lenses with more than half a frame, especially in the case of large aperture. So the landlord has money, I suggest the whole picture.

As for the camera, the one in Quan Huafu will do. Canon recommends 60d for half width, and Nikon recommends d7000 or d7 100. Canon's 60d half-width is the most cost-effective. Compared with 550d, 600d, 650d and 700d, the viewfinder of 60d is a pentagonal mirror, and the other four are pentagonal mirrors. The official standard battery for the 60d is 1800 mAh, and others seem to be 1200. There is also a window showing iso and shutter on the 60d, and nothing else. Of course, the processors of 650d and 700d are five generations, and the other four generations. But the biggest function of the processor is speed, which is reflected in continuous shooting and video. But it is unwise to shoot video with a SLR instead of taking it to the stadium, so the processor is of little significance. And 70d is an upgrade of 60d, that is,18 million pixels is upgraded to 22 million, and the processor is upgraded from 4th generation to 5th generation, so it is of little significance, but it is much more expensive. Nikon's d90 and Canon's 60d have the same configuration, but120,000 pixels are always a little low, so we recommend its upgraded version d7000 or d7 100. You should be careful, Canon's 60d and Nikon's d90 are the best-selling SLR, which makes sense and is the success of these two machines, Kodak, Fuji, Samsung and Nikon. For the lens, it is recommended to buy a cheap one, because you will find that it is 18-55, 55-250, 17-85, 18- 135,18-/kloc-0. The so-called "a mirror travels all over the world" refers to a wide zoom range, not a good picture quality.

Therefore, photography, technology first, lens second and camera third (such as cards, micro-cameras, SLR and Quan Huafu SLR), its own structure determines that under the condition of large aperture, the Quan Huafu semi-frame micro-single-phase body with single camera now requires clarity and background, which also makes the photo picture cleaner. But these are the results of the lens, so the lens is more effective than the camera)

Question 4: Is it better to shoot people and night scenes with Nikon SLR or Canon SLR? You made a D3. Absolutely awesome. Or D300 or Fuji S5. Canon 5D is too old.

Both D80 and 450D stand on one side. Don't think that Canon's noise suppression is good. After using it, you will know that Canon's noise reduction is at the expense of details. Personally, I think the noise reduction effect is not as good as that of software and Canon JPEG files, even for ISO 100 films. The noise has been reduced. So it looks less noisy. Actually, it is not. Nikon is characterized by less internal processing. So Nikon's film looks less clean than Canon's. In fact, this is done to preserve details. Even with D80. Just use NEF. Do it with NX in the future. Absolutely beautiful.

At present, except Nikon D3. Any machine with ISO higher than 1600 is basically useless.

Question 5: Is Canon camera good at taking portraits? Or Nikon? Both are big brands, so it's no problem to take portraits.

However, Canon has a portrait head with an ultra-large aperture of EF 85 MMF1.2L. The maximum aperture of Nikon's 85mm lens is only F 1.4. In addition, the skin of the characters photographed by Canon is red, which looks better. But now I don't care if the colors of digital photos are randomly adjusted.

In short, both of them are very good, and there are more people taking portraits with Canon.

Question 6: Is Canon really more suitable for taking portraits than Nikon? Why is it actually quite appropriate? What matters is what lens you use and who took it. Even if there is a difference, it doesn't matter much to people who are not great gods.

Question 7: Is it better to shoot people with Canon or Nikon? It used to be said that there are Canon portraits and Nikon landscapes, but now the newly listed SLR and Nikon portraits are basically not much different in color.

Question 8: Which is better, Nikon or Canon? Which is more suitable for shooting people? Depends on what you think. Nikon's films are sharp and highly reproducible, which can objectively reflect the theme. Canon's films are softer and more tense. Obviously, if you want to represent Nikon, if you want to make something artistic, it is Canon. Of course, the actual difference between these two brands is often difficult for us to observe.

20 1 1 year

Question 9: Is Canon really more suitable for portrait shooting than Nikon? Why one is that the color style shot by Canon is more suitable for people's skin color, and the other is that there is no "idiot" like Nikon. In fact, there is no question of whether the equipment is suitable or not. The key is whether people can shoot.

Question 10: Which is better, Canon 70d or Nikon d7 100? 70D out of focus, D7 100 color is not good.

70D video recording is powerful, but it is loose to take out-of-focus photos. D7 100 has no low-pass filter, and the photographic clarity is 70 days.

70D amateur, major D7 100.

70D large plastic shell, D7 100 large area metal.

70D 19 point full cross focusing, the camera focusing accuracy is very general, and the video can be autofocused quickly and accurately.

D7 100, 5 1 point AF focusing, the focusing element is the same as D800, which is two grades higher than 70D, but video recording cannot achieve autofocus.

The 70D has a wifi module, which can transmit photos to the mobile phone in time. D7 100 has no wifi module.

70D has a touch screen, which is very easy to use and beginners learn quickly. D7 100 has no touch screen, so it's not easy to get started, but after getting familiar with it, you will find that the operation is obviously better than Canon's computer science and ergonomics.

70-day portraits perform well in skin color, but their tolerance is low. D7 100 color is suitable for any subject except portrait. If you are proficient in PS, then ignore it.

70D+ low-end Canon lens = rubbish. 70D+ bull's head = can't give full play to all the advantages of Quan Huafu lens.

D7 100+ Nikon low-end lens = good imaging quality. D7 100+ tauren = can't give full play to all the advantages of the whole map.

Canon lens group is the most abundant, but the high, middle and low-grade imaging is very different, and the quality of workmanship is uneven. The typical 10 yuan is divided into three parts.

Nikon's lens group is not as rich as Canon's, but the quality of workmanship is relatively uniform, and the low-end lens group is kind, and the imaging quality from low-end to high-end is good.

If you are just having fun, I suggest you choose 70D. If you want to improve yourself and study hard, please choose D7 100.

If you use more Canon, please choose 70D. If you use more Nikon, please choose D7 100.

Personally, I feel that the comprehensive quality of D7 100 is over 70D, and the difference between them is consistent with the actual selling price. (Premise is the licensed price)

I am a double major supporter of Canon Nikon, and I hope to help you to some extent!

Camera recommendation for portrait shooting

The camera for taking portraits is recommended as follows:

1. Canon EOS5DMarkIV

Its autofocus tracking and autofocus face detection functions can ensure that you get the clearest images in still portraits and action shots. Even if you miss a few millimeters of focus, dual-pixel RAW technology can also let you shift your focus in post-processing. For example, if your eyelashes are sharper than your eyes, you can make some adjustments. Look! _ sharp eyes. Another advantage of dual-pixel RAW technology is that it can adjust the scattered scenes in the background to obtain more pleasant effects.

2. Canon 6D Mark II

If you want to upgrade to a full-frame camera, but are not going to upgrade to a professional model, Canon 6DMarkII is the perfect entry-level digital SLR camera for portrait photography. It has a high-quality 26-megapixel sensor and good noise performance at a high ISO value, although it is not on the same level as the top cameras on the market today.

3. Canon EOS90D

The sensor is 32.5MP, and its resolution is higher than the Quan Huafu 6DMarkII recommended above (although the sensor is small, it has a series of differences in sensitivity and dynamic range). The tailored sensor keeps this model in the category of producers or enthusiasts, but this does not mean that it is not an excellent camera. For some types of portraits-for example, couples or family meetings-you can definitely do professional work.

4.canon EOSR5

If you are a professional and want to adopt mirrorless technology, Canon EOSR5 is a good choice, provided that you can afford the price.

EOSR5 is equipped with a 45-megapixel Quan Huafu photoreceptor, which is specially used for professional photography (if you are looking for an amateur version, you should see the powerful EOSR6).

5. Nikon D850

Action shooting, you can get the highest continuous shooting of 7fps. The D850 also has a focus peak (manual focus only), which allows you to identify the clearest area in the picture by displaying color superposition. If you prefer autofocus to manual focus, you will definitely like the 153 point autofocus system.

Ten film cameras recommended by novice into the pit.

Although few people play with film cameras except installation, it is recommended as equipment. In order to benefit the public, I recommend ten types of film cameras with the following specifications according to my own preferences for equipment, which are basically aimed at new film users and beginners.

135 filmfmslr

Nikon method

I was going to recommend Nikon FE-2, but I thought of a model that was ignored by domestic Douban fans, Nikon F A. Later, I visited a treasure and found that Nikon hair was cheaper than Nikon hair -2, so I decided to recommend Nikon hair.

The difference between Nikon method and MF film camera in the same period is that it is equipped with Nikon automatic metering system (ERN), which is the initial version of matrix metering system that Nikon has been upgrading on digital cameras. Needless to say, the advantages of partition metering over central key metering are obvious. Nikon originally wanted to design this system on the fuselage of FE-2, but due to the time schedule, this system was finally used in FA, and FE-2 still adopted the 60/40 central button metering system.

Nikon has four ASMP exposure modes, which are very common in digital cameras. If you have experience in using digital cameras, Nikon has no difficulty except manual focusing.

Nikon's flash synchronization speed is 1/250 seconds, and the highest shutter speed is 1/4000 seconds, with a honeycomb titanium curtain. If there is anything unpleasant about Nikon hair, it should be that its silver top cover is not made of metal. At the same time, FM-2 and FE-2 are all-metal fuselage.

Olympus -2

This is a work that Olympus stole from Gao Tianyuan because of the existence of an anti-douban machine. Although I prefer OM-3 or OM-4, it is important for beginners not to be polluted by all kinds of metaphysics first, and to have a good camera first. In terms of appearance, OM-2 is compact and exquisite, and the sunken design of the pentaprism makes it look very pocket-sized.

This is a fuselage that also has aperture priority automatic program exposure, and OM-2 also has OTF metering function. The maximum shutter speed is11000 seconds, and two steps of exposure compensation adjustment are provided during program exposure.

135FilmAFSLR

NikonF 100

If you feel tired after using the digital machine for too long, but feel that MF film is a bit heavy, Shaoxia, you might as well experience a NikonF 100. This is a film body with almost the same performance as Nikon's early digital cameras, with five-point autofocus, mature and accurate metering system and fast and reliable automatic film passing. F 100 can be used as Nikon's digital camera.

F 100 In addition to the latest E lens, Nikon's D and G lenses can be inserted into the F 100 body very smoothly, and the autofocus and photometry are perfect. F4S can choose F 100, but I don't think it looks good, and the buttons on F4S in the post-film era look troublesome and not concise and elegant enough. F 100 has F5 and F6 options, but the focus of F5 does not match the Jiao Hong point, and F6 is too elegant and expensive for beginners to control.

EOS- 1V

And Nikon F6 are two heroes in the era of film ending. If you count Minolta a7, it should be one of the three heroes. EOS- 1V is recommended for simple reasons, accurate focusing and reliable body. If you are a Canon digital camera user, the EF lens can work when plugged in, and the performance in all aspects is much better than the F 100 recommended by me to Nikon users. Although it is not cheap, it is definitely not expensive. If you get the handle, you can fully experience the feeling brought by the 1 digital model.

135 filmfrf

MinoltaCLE

This is the honeymoon product of Leica and Minolta. Leica launched the CL version, and Minolta launched the CLE version. Generally speaking, there is no performance difference between the two fuselage, the biggest difference lies in the appearance and price. For novices, if you want a small but exquisite paraxial film camera with powerful but gentle film, firm but quiet shutter and wide and bright viewfinder, Minolta CL-E is the best cost-effective choice. Selling CLE is almost my most regretful event, and I regret it very much. It's a godsend to buy such a fuselage for 2000 RMB.

CLE can use all Leica M-port lenses, no matter Leica, Fu Lunda or L39, there is no big problem. The only pain point is that the frame of CLE is 28mm, 40mm and 90mm, and the optional lens lacks two common focal lengths, 35mm and 50 mm. Besides Minolta's 28mm and 40mm lenses, you can also choose Fu Lunda's VM40mmF 1.4. If you don't care about framing, is it okay to shoot with a 35mm lens? You use the side axis, so what do you care about taking pictures?

135FilmAFRF

CONTAXG 1

I want to autofocus paraxial film, and the cost-effective one is CONTAXG 1. The fuselage investment of about 1000 yuan is still worthwhile. CONTAXG 1 is a very classic fuselage launched by Kyocera, and the later upgraded G2 swept the country. G 1 supports autofocus, of course, it is not TTL, and the shutter speed can reach 1/2000 seconds at the highest. A shutter is an electronically controlled vertical curtain. Support automatic exposure, TTL metering, and central button metering is fairly accurate. The fuselage can automatically read the DX code of the film and automatically identify the ISO degree of the film. Although the viewfinder of G 1 is a real-image viewfinder, it is too small, which is one of the few shortcomings of G 1. G 1 uses two CR2 batteries, which are relatively easy to buy in JD.COM.

120 filmftlr

Brownie Katsi

It may be the most cost-effective 120 film SLR in China at present.

Of course, Brownica's equipment is famous for its excellent cost performance, and ETRSi is the most cost-effective. ETRSi is a mature version in the later period of this series. If you have the energy to distinguish carefully, other ETRSI models are also worth starting with. As a modular system, ETRSi can replace the back, focus screen and viewfinder, and the accessories are surprisingly rich. Although PE series lenses are not the price of cabbage, the resolution and Jiao Wai can still be maintained above the standard. For beginners, this system is worth studying deeply. You can basically make a hole before and after the equipment. As for buying a Hasselblad 500C single lens, it is more fun, more practical and cheaper. The disadvantage is that the shape is not Hasselblad enough to pretend.

Oh, yes, the width of 135 is also supported.

YASHICAMat 124G

I don't know if Yasika 124G is a national dual-reflex camera. In short, it is the most popular dual-reflex camera in China except Lulai. This kind of double-reverse positioning is a popular product, the price is very low, and a lot of plastic parts are used, but it is still very reliable on the whole, and there are few serious mechanical and optical failures. Yaxika 124G adopts a very classic 3-group 4-piece 75mmF3.5-day lens, which has good overall optical quality, high central resolution and weak edges. This camera sells much better than Seagull, and it is sold in department stores in small counties, so the number of 124G handed down from generation to generation is very large, and it is not difficult to find a good color one. Of course, after the popularity of a camera, even if it is second-hand, the price will fluctuate. If you can't find the right price 124G, I recommend Lulek in the early 2000s, which is quite fun.

Pentax67

The 120 SLR, which is called "monster" by foreigners, is very heavy to start with, but it is very cost-effective. One machine and one mirror in the early 3000 s is not a big problem. If you want to enjoy the large format of 6×7 cheaply, it is Pentax 67. On the whole, Pentax 67 is like a big 135, except for the serious mechanical shock. The sound of the huge reflector falling and lifting feels that the cannon is firing. No matter what subject you are shooting, no matter how many people participate in the group shooting, as long as you hold the Pentax 67, let go.