Does bigfoot really exist?

People who support the existence of bigfoot have a very strong evidence, that is, in 1967, American Patterson took a precious bigfoot lens of about 60 seconds with his own camera.

In the short photo, bigfoot's shoulder width is nearly one meter, he is covered with black fur, his feet are bent and his knees are drooping. She looks like a gorilla, but her posture and walking posture are more human than gorillas.

According to Patterson, who filmed the video at that time, the big guy who looked like a man and an ape was drinking water by the river. Patterson suddenly realized that it might be the legendary bigfoot and quickly took out his camera to shoot, but bigfoot quickly got up and returned to the jungle.

This video has aroused the interest of countless scientists and explorers all over the world, and some even went to a valley in northern California, where bigfoot was discovered. Later, this video was made into a documentary, which caused great influence all over the world.

However, in March 2004, Bob hieronymus, a 63-year-old man from Yajiwa, Washington, revealed to the press that bigfoot was actually dressed up with fur props from gorillas. It turned out that Patterson and hieronymus reached a gentleman's agreement, and hieronymus put on a gorilla costume and gave a special performance in front of the camera. The reward and confidentiality fee is * * * 65,438+0,000 USD.

However, up to now, Sironi Moose didn't even get a penny, because Patterson, who shot the video, died as early as 1972, so there is nothing to tell.

Bigfoot was originally a bison.

The sparsely populated jungle in western Canada has always been regarded as the haunt of bigfoot. Earlier this week, two hikers claimed that they saw bigfoot in a forest 160 km east of Whitehorse, the capital of Yukon. He is tall and hairy, and looks like an ape. Two witnesses said that bigfoot acted very quickly. After discovering the abnormality, he quickly hid in the jungle and disappeared, but they were lucky to find the hair left by bigfoot.

David Coatman, a wildlife geneticist in university of alberta, Edmonton, often works with wildlife experts in the Yukon. He agreed to conduct a DNA test on mysterious hair and then compare its DNA sequencing with known creatures. However, the test results show that this tuft of hair does not belong to the mysterious bigfoot at all.

Coltman said: "Through testing, we found that the DNA sequencing of these hairs is almost identical to that of bison. Therefore, this is not bigfoot's hair at all, but the mane on the bison. "

Related viewpoints

Although many scientists think that bigfoot is empty talk, some reports cannot but attract people's attention. Some experts believe that bigfoot may have been misinformed. Up to now, there have been various rumors about bigfoot, but we always know his name, but we don't know him.

Scholar Wang Yuan said: "The evolution of living things is irreversible, and extinct creatures will not reappear. Although it cannot be ruled out that there are still many places that we humans have not developed, if an original large species has lived with us for millions of years without being discovered, it is indeed a very small probability event. " Based on these questions, he felt that all the legends about bigfoot might be misinformed.