Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Tourist attractions - In which countries have coups occurred in recent years?

In which countries have coups occurred in recent years?

Only the story of the Thai coup. Since the overthrow of the autocratic monarchy in 1932, the royal family, the military and the government have formed the three forces that promote the historical process of Thailand. Regarding the relationship between the three, the Chairman of the Thai Privy Council once said, " The army is the horse, the government is the rider, and the real master is the king.” The 83-year-old King Bhumibol Adulyadej of Thailand has extremely high popularity and is also the longest-reigning king in the world. In the hearts of many Thais, Bhumibol is their patron saint. Peasants are the main force of the Red Shirts. They oppose the current government dominated by urban elites, but they still have great respect for the king. During the 64 years of the King's reign, there have been 20 coups in Thailand, 17 constitutions have been replaced, and 23 prime ministers have been replaced, but Bhumibol's status has always been as stable as Mount Tai. Although as the King of Thailand, he enjoys the "power of advisory, encouragement and warning", Bhumibol only plays a cautious role in advising on legislation and the constitution. Usually he only exercises these powers when the prime minister pays him a private audience. He rarely intervened in politics, but whenever Thailand was in crisis, he acted decisively. Former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra, who has been in exile for many years, initially attempted to challenge the authority of the King of Thailand. This is an inexcusable behavior in Thailand. In addition, the King of Thailand firmly believes that Thai people and leaders should abide by Buddhist norms of life, that is, people's lives should tend to Simplicity, rather than pursuing excess and showing off wealth, has also led to differences between him and Thaksin in many aspects. In the eyes of the Thai royal family and many Thais, Thaksin's main shortcoming is his character. Thaksin's many words and deeds showed a lack of respect for the King of Thailand and the royal family. He showed great independence, which the royal family could not agree with. According to the standards of Western democracy, the nationalization of the military is one of the indicators to judge whether a country is a democracy. The Thai military has always enjoyed extra independence, and the law has not been able to completely nationalize it. Soldiers often rely on worshiping the King of Thailand to strengthen the legitimacy of their political involvement. Their loyalty to the King of Thailand is higher than that of the democratically elected government. The contradiction between the army and the democratically elected government also makes the Thai King a favorable third party. After the end of World War II, the Thai army was actually no longer mobilized by the government, but a brightly colored "royal army." It is also considered a political force that can effectively govern the country. Behind the close relationship between the military and the Thai royal family, the combined force of the two actually controls the nature and direction of the country. The government also has to accept their orders at any time, and can only be regarded as a "third-class political force" at best. In Thailand's political arena, there are often various disputes, and when such disputes reach a stalemate, it is the military with the acquiescence of the king, because the king is under a constitutional monarchy and cannot directly intervene in politics. . Then he used the army to settle disputes and end disputes. In fact, at the beginning of these disputes, there was no shadow of the king and the army behind them.