A pedestrian was killed on the expressway, and the driver was mainly responsible. Where is the watershed of this event?

Traffic accidents are quite common in life, but in many cases, the responsibility for traffic accidents will be attributed to the strong side, thus giving birth to the group of "touching porcelain". Generally speaking, pedestrians are killed in motor vehicle lanes, and the driver bears the main responsibility, but from a legal point of view, the division of responsibility is not entirely like this.

First of all, if the driver dies on the motorway without fault under normal circumstances, the responsibility should be borne by the pedestrians themselves. Generally speaking, everyone yearns for fairness, but in real life, once a traffic accident happens, many people will look at it from the perspective of sympathy for the weak, and feel that as a strong driver, they should bear the main responsibility for the accident, and then they will subconsciously ignore fairness. But from a fair point of view, if the driver is not at fault, then the pedestrian is killed in the motorway, and the pedestrian should bear the loss himself and compensate the driver for the loss. This may sound heartless, but if we want to be fair, we must be fair first, and we must not let those who obey traffic laws bear unnecessary losses. However, violators are unreservedly tolerant just because they are in a weak position. This is not the connotation of fairness. If so, it will lead to the absurd result that "the weak party rationally violates laws and regulations and the strong party unreasonably abides by rules and regulations". Therefore, pedestrians who are killed in the motorway must bear the losses themselves.

Secondly, if a pedestrian is killed when crossing the zebra crossing, in this case, the motor vehicle must take full responsibility. Generally speaking, according to traffic regulations, pedestrians and motor vehicles have their own driving routes. Pedestrians take the sidewalk and cars take the motorway, but at the intersection of traffic lights, the sidewalk will overlap with the motorway, that is, the zebra crossing, and there will be overlaps in crowded places. Many places have relevant regulations for pedestrians crossing zebra crossings. Motor vehicles must give way to pedestrians, even if they don't, they will be punished by "fine 50 yuan, with two points deducted". In this case, the pedestrian was killed by a motor vehicle when crossing the zebra crossing, and the motor vehicle driver must take full responsibility. After all, it is necessary for pedestrians to walk zebra crossings, and it is also necessary for motor vehicles to slow down. Whoever breaks the rules should be punished.

Finally, judge the responsibility of motor vehicles killing pedestrians. Many times, drivers are given full responsibility, mostly because of drunk driving. For today's people, driving without drinking and drinking without driving is a creed, but there are still many drivers who always take chances and always feel that driving will not be an accident. In this case, there are many traffic accidents that cause death because of stepping on the brake accelerator by mistake. In this case, no matter what the pedestrian's fault is, when judging the responsibility, the motor vehicle driver belongs to the main responsible party and takes full responsibility.

Of course, there are many other situations, such as the "touch porcelain" team. We should not sympathize with such people. Only by strictly observing the traffic laws can we crack down on the phenomenon of touching porcelain, and those who abide by the rules cannot be finally compensated.