Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Weather forecast - Please provide a legal document (preferably including an indictment, judgment, and defense statement) on the crime of organizing disabled people to beg. Thank you

Please provide a legal document (preferably including an indictment, judgment, and defense statement) on the crime of organizing disabled people to beg. Thank you

Trial record of the first case of organizing disabled people to beg in Beijing

The procuratorial agency alleged that since 2009, the defendants Liu Sheshe, Zhang Xinli, Liu Huimin, and Wang Li had premeditated, beaten, insulted, Using verbal threats and other means to organize the victims Liu Moumou (male, 54 years old), Sheng Moumou (male, 40 years old), Sun Moumou (male, 49 years old), Zhao Moumou (male, 40 years old) and many other blind people to Begging activities were carried out in front of Wudaokou Metro Station in Haidian District, Beijing, and in front of the Third Hospital of Peking University. On April 30, 2010, Liu Sheshe, Zhang Xinli, Liu Huimin, and Wang Li were captured and brought to justice by the public security organs.

The procuratorial organ believes that the defendants Liu Sheshe, Zhang Xinli, Liu Huimin, and Wang Li used violence and coercion to organize multiple disabled people to beg, and they should be held criminally responsible for the crime of organizing disabled people to beg.

It is reported that this case is the first case in Beijing to be prosecuted for this crime after the crime of organizing disabled people and children to beg was added to the Criminal Law in 2006.

At 10:15 a.m. on January 13, 2011, the 17th Courtroom of the Haidian Court opened a hearing on the case, which was broadcast live on China Court Network.

Moderator: Preparations for the trial are ready, and the clerk has entered the court.

Clerk: The rules of the court will now be read. 1. No audio, video, photography or recording is allowed without permission; 2. No entry into the trial area is allowed; 3. No applause, noise, noise and other behaviors that affect the trial activities are allowed; 4. No random remarks or questions are allowed; 5. Pay attention to maintaining indoor hygiene; 6. Please turn off wireless communication tools. For those who violate the rules of attendance, the presiding judge, court personnel, and judicial police should advise and stop those who do not listen to the advice. Upon the decision of the presiding judge, the film, audio tape, or video tape may be confiscated; or ordered to leave the court until criminal liability is investigated according to law. .

Presiding Judge: (beating the hammer). The court is now in session. Please ask the court bailiff to bring the defendants Liu Sheshe, Zhang Xinli, Liu Huimin, and Wang Li to the court.

Presiding Judge: What is your name, the first defendant?

Defendant: (First Defendant Liu Sheshe) Liu Sheshe.

Presiding Judge: Is there any other name?

Defendant: (Liu Society) None.

Presiding Judge: When were you born?

Defendant: (Liu Society) November 25, 1971.

Presiding Judge: Ethnicity?

Defendant: (Liu Society) Han nationality.

Presiding Judge: Educational level?

Defendant: (Liu Society) Primary School.

Presiding Judge: Place of origin?

Defendant: (Liu Society) Shangcai County, Henan Province.

Presiding Judge: Home address?

Defendant: (Liu Society) Menglou Village, Wulong Township, Shangcai County, Henan Province.

Presiding Judge: Do you have a job?

Defendant: (Liu Society) farmer.

Presiding Judge: Have you ever been tried or punished legally before?

Defendant: (Liu Society) No.

Presiding Judge: Have you invited a defender?

Defendant: (Liu Society) No.

Presiding Judge: When were you detained?

Defendant: (Liu Society) April 30, 2010.

Presiding Judge: When were you arrested?

Defendant: (Liu Society) June 2, 2010.

Presiding Judge: Why were you arrested?

Defendant: (Liu Society) is suspected of organizing disabled people to beg.

Presiding Judge: When did you receive a copy of the indictment from the People’s Procuratorate of Haidian District, Beijing?

Defendant: (Liu Society) December 23, 2010.

Presiding Judge: What is your name, the second defendant?

Defendant: Zhang Xinli.

Presiding Judge: Is there any other name?

Defendant: Zhang Li.

Presiding Judge: When were you born?

Defendant: (Zhang Xinli) July 2, 1971.

Presiding Judge: Ethnicity?

Defendant: (Zhang Xinli) Han nationality.

Presiding Judge: Educational level?

Defendant: (Zhang Xinli) is illiterate.

Presiding Judge: Place of origin?

Defendant: (Zhang Xinli) Shangcai County, Henan Province.

Presiding Judge: Home address?

Defendant: (Zhang Xinli) Menglou Village, Wulong Township, Shangcai County, Henan Province.

Presiding Judge: Do you have a job?

Defendant: (Zhang Xinli) farmer.

Presiding Judge: Have you ever been tried or punished legally before?

Defendant: (Zhang Xinli) No.

Presiding Judge: Have you invited a defender?

Defendant: (Zhang Xinli) No.

Presiding Judge: When were you detained?

Defendant: (Zhang Xinli) April 30, 2010.

Presiding Judge: When were you arrested?

Defendant: (Zhang Xinli) June 2, 2010.

Presiding Judge: Why were you arrested?

Defendant: (Zhang Xinli) is suspected of organizing disabled people to beg.

Presiding Judge: When did you receive a copy of the indictment from the People’s Procuratorate of Haidian District, Beijing?

Defendant: (Zhang Xinli) December 23, 2010.

Presiding Judge: What is your name, the third defendant?

Defendant: Liu Huimin.

Presiding Judge: Is there any other name?

Defendant: (Liu Huimin) None.

Presiding Judge: When were you born?

Defendant: (Liu Huimin) May 24, 1974.

Presiding Judge: Ethnicity?

Defendant: (Liu Huimin) Han nationality.

Presiding Judge: Educational level?

Defendant: (Liu Huimin) Primary School.

Presiding Judge: Place of origin?

Defendant: (Liu Huimin) Shangcai County, Henan Province.

Presiding Judge: Home address?

Defendant: (Liu Huimin) Menglou Village, Wulong Township, Shangcai County, Henan Province.

Presiding Judge: Do you have a job?

Defendant: (Liu Huimin) farmer.

Presiding Judge: Have you ever been tried or punished legally before?

Defendant: (Liu Huimin) No.

Presiding Judge: Have you invited a defender?

Defendant: (Liu Huimin) No.

Presiding Judge: When were you detained?

Defendant: (Liu Huimin) April 30, 2010.

Presiding Judge: When were you arrested?

Defendant: (Liu Huimin) June 2, 2010.

Presiding Judge: Why were you arrested?

Defendant: (Liu Huimin) is suspected of organizing disabled people to beg.

Presiding Judge: When did you receive a copy of the indictment from the People’s Procuratorate of Haidian District, Beijing?

Defendant: (Liu Huimin) December 23, 2010.

Presiding Judge: What is your name, the fourth defendant?

Defendant: Wang Li.

Presiding Judge: Is there any other name?

Defendant: (Wang Li) Hou Li.

Presiding Judge: When were you born?

Defendant: (Wang Li) November 23, 1971.

Presiding Judge: Ethnicity?

Defendant: (Wang Li) Han nationality.

Presiding Judge: Educational level?

Defendant: (Wang Li) Primary School.

Presiding Judge: Place of origin?

Defendant: (Wang Li) Shangcai County, Henan Province.

Presiding Judge: Home address?

Defendant: (Wang Li) Menglou Village, Wulong Township, Shangcai County, Henan Province.

Presiding Judge: Do you have a job?

Defendant: (Wang Li) farmer.

Presiding Judge: Have you ever been tried or punished legally before?

Defendant: (Wang Li) No.

Presiding Judge: Have you invited a defender?

Defendant: (Wang Li) No.

Presiding Judge: When were you detained?

Defendant: (Wang Li) April 30, 2010.

Presiding Judge: When were you arrested?

Defendant: (Wang Li) June 2, 2010.

Presiding Judge: Why were you arrested?

Defendant: (Wang Li) is suspected of organizing disabled people to beg.

Presiding Judge: When did you receive a copy of the indictment from the People’s Procuratorate of Haidian District, Beijing?

Defendant: (Wang Li) December 23, 2010.

Presiding Judge: The People's Court of Haidian District, Beijing, today held a public hearing in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China, the defendant Liu Sheshe, who was prosecuted by the People's Procuratorate of Haidian District, Beijing. , Zhang Xinli, Liu Huimin, and Wang Li organized the case of disabled people begging. This court is led by acting judge Zhang Peng as the presiding judge, and a collegial panel composed of people's assessors Cheng Baorong and Wang Yijing. Clerk Yi Meng serves as court recorder. The Beijing Haidian District People's Procuratorate appointed acting prosecutor Lin Jie to appear in court to support the prosecution. Did you hear clearly?

Defendant: (4 defendants) Listen clearly.

President: According to the provisions of the "Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China", during the court hearing, the defendant has the right to apply for recusal, the right to apply for notification of new witnesses to appear in court, and the right to mediate Obtain new physical evidence, apply for re-evaluation or inspection; have the right to defend themselves, and the defendant also has the right to make a final statement (the above rights are all interpreted in a popular way). Did the defendant understand?

Defendant: (4 defendants) I understand.

Presiding Judge: Do you want to apply for recusal?

Defendants: (4 defendants) do not apply for recusal.

Presiding Judge: The court investigation will now begin. First, the prosecutor will read out the indictment.

Prosecutor: Read out the indictment. Since 2009, the defendants Liu Sheshe, Zhang Xinli, Liu Huimin, and Wang Li had premeditated and used means such as beating, insulting, and verbal threats to organize the victim Liu Moumou (male, 54 years old). ), Sheng Moumou (male, 40 years old), Sun Moumou (male, 49 years old), Zhao Moumou (male, 40 years old) and many other blind people were in front of Wudaokou Metro Station in Haidian District, Beijing, at the Third Hospital of Peking University Begging activities are carried out in front of the door and other places. On April 30, 2010, Liu Sheshe, Zhang Xinli, Liu Huimin, and Wang Li were captured and brought to justice by the public security organs.

Prosecutor: The defendants Liu Sheshe, Zhang Xinli, Liu Huimin, and Wang Li used violence and coercion to organize multiple disabled people to beg, and they should be held criminally responsible for the crime of organizing disabled people to beg.

Presiding Judge: Did you hear clearly?

Defendant Liu Society: I heard you clearly.

Defendant Zhang Xinli: I heard you clearly.

Defendant Wang Li: I heard you clearly.

Defendant Liu Huimin: I heard you clearly.

Presiding Judge: Is the indictment read out by the prosecutor consistent with the one you received?

Defendant Liu Society: Consistent.

Defendant Zhang Xinli: Agreed.

Defendant Wang Li: Agreed.

Defendant Liu Huimin: Agreed.

Presiding Judge: Defendant, what are your opinions on the facts and charges charged in the indictment?

Defendant Liu Society: I have never beaten a disabled person.

Defendant Zhang Xinli: I have never beaten a disabled person.

Defendant Liu Huimin: I have never beaten a disabled person.

Defendant Wang Li: No opinion.

Presiding Judge: Please ask the prosecutor to interrogate the defendant regarding the content of the accusation.

Prosecutor: The defendant will no longer be interrogated in court.

Presiding Judge: Let’s proceed to court evidence and cross-examination. First, the prosecutor presents evidence to the court.

Prosecutor: Reading the confession of the defendant Liu Sheshe, it was confirmed that from April 2009 to the present, the defendants Liu Sheshe, Liu Huimin, Zhang Xinli, and Wang Li were in the Beijing Third Hospital of Haidian District, Chaoyang Shuangjing and other places , organized the blind Liu Zhimin, Sheng Gaizheng, Sun Maodan, Zhao Ruyi and others to beg. Among them, Liu Shexiang beat the disabled.

Presiding Judge: Defendant, what do you think?

Defendant Liu Society: I have never beaten a disabled person.

Defendant Zhang Xinli: I have never beaten a disabled person.

Defendant Liu Huimin: I have never beaten a disabled person.

Defendant Wang Li: No opinion.

Presiding Judge: Tell me about the order in which these blind men arrived in Beijing.

Defendant Liu Sheshe: The first one was Zhao Ruyi, I can’t remember the others clearly.

Prosecutor: Read the defendant Zhang Xinli’s confession, confirming that she, Liu Sheshe, Liu Huimin and others organized blind begging. Four blind men lived in a house, and they were scolded and beaten whenever they wanted. They were allowed to go out to beg no matter what the weather was like.

Presiding Judge: Defendant, what do you think?

Defendant Zhang Xinli: I did not beat, scold or threaten the blind person.

Defendant Liu Society: He has objections to the amount of money.

Defendant Liu Huimin: I did not beat, scold or threaten the blind man.

Defendant Wang Li: No opinion.

Prosecutor: Read the confession of defendant Liu Huimin, which proves that Wang Li, together with Liu Sheshe, Zhang Xinli, and Liu Huimin, organized a coercion of blind people to beg.

Presiding Judge: Defendant, what do you think?

Defendant Liu Huimin: I have never beaten a blind person.

Defendant Liu Society: I have never beaten a blind person.

Defendant Zhang Xinli: I have never beaten or frightened a blind person.

Defendant Wang Li: I have never seen Liu Huimin beat anyone.

Prosecutor: The defendant Wang Li’s confession was read out, proving that since 2009, the defendant Wang Li, together with Liu Sheshe, Zhang Xinli, and Liu Huimin, organized a coercion of blind people to beg. The blind man was found by Liu Jianshe, the eldest brother of her husband Liu Huimin, in Henan. He, Liu Sheshe, Liu Huimin, and Zhang Li took these blind men to beg for money in Beijing. They have not given the blind man any money since September. When the blind man wanted to go home, he and Liu Sheshe and other four people had all beaten blind people. On April 30, 2010, they were captured by the police when they were begging with Sheng Gaizheng and Liu Zhimin.

Presiding Judge: Defendant, what do you think?

Defendant Wang Li: No opinion. I've hit people, but I haven't seen anyone hit anyone.

Defendant Liu Society: I have an opinion. What she said is not true.

Defendant Zhang Xinli: I have never beaten a blind person.

Defendant Liu Huimin: I have an opinion, it was the disabled person who beat me.

Presiding Judge: Did the blind man mail home the more than 5,000 yuan he begged for?

Defendant Liu Huimin: Passed by mail.

Prosecutor: Read out the statement of the victim Liu Zhimin, proving that since 2009, the defendant Wang Li, together with Liu Sheshe, Zhang Xinli, and Liu Huimin, have organized blind people to beg. I didn't want to play the erhu and beg for them, but I told them that if they didn't let me, they would scold me and beat me. As a blind person, I couldn't resist, and I couldn't run away even if I wanted to. They just insulted me by saying that I was worse than a pig or a dog.

They beat me many times, I can't remember exactly. They just punched and kicked me often and asked me if I was still willing to do it for them. I had to say that I was willing to do it for them, and they stopped beating me. My whole body hurt when I was beaten, but now it has healed over time.

Presiding Judge: Defendant, what do you think?

Defendant Liu Society: I have never beaten a blind person.

Defendant Zhang Xinli: I have never beaten a blind person.

Defendant Liu Huimin: I have never beaten a blind person.

Defendant Wang Li: I did, but I don’t know if others did.

Prosecutor: Read the corrected statement of the victim Sheng, proving that the defendant Wang Li, together with Liu Sheshe, Zhang Xinli, and Liu Huimin, organized blind people to beg since 2009. Several of them beat me, kicking me on the back and hitting me on the head with their fists. They beat me twice, first in May and then a second time a few days later. It hurt at the time, but it's gone now.

Presiding Judge: Defendant, what do you think?

Defendant Liu Society: No.

Defendant Zhang Xinli: No.

Defendant Wang Li: No.

Defendant Liu Huimin: No.

Prosecutor: Read out the statement of the victim Sun Maodan, proving that since February 2009, Liu Huimin forced the blind Sun Maodan to play the erhu and beg. Among them, Liu Sheshe and Liu Huimin coerced the blind Liu Zhimin and Sun Maodan to beg.

Presiding Judge: Defendant, what do you think?

Defendant Liu Society: Don’t know.

Defendant Zhang Xinli: I did not take Sun Maodan to beg.

Defendant Liu Huimin: I did not hit the blind person.

Defendant Wang Li: I have no objection.

Prosecutor: Read out the statement of the victim Zhao Ruyi, proving that Wang Li, Liu Sheshe, Zhang Xinli, and Liu Huimin organized blind people to beg and beat and scolded them. Liu Sheshe beat me and threatened me. He often hit me on the back and said, "I'll beat you to death if you go home." He beat me about four or five times. I can't remember the specific time and place.

Presiding Judge: Defendant, what do you think?

Defendant Liu Society: I did not beat or scold the blind man.

Defendant Zhang Xinli: I did not beat or scold the blind man.

Defendant Liu Huimin: I did not beat or scold the blind man.

Defendant Wang Li: I did not hit Zhao Ruyi.

Prosecutor: Read the testimony of witness Xu Congming, which proved that Xu Congming saw Sheng Gaizheng begging at Wudaokou Metro Station from August to September 2009.

The testimony of witness Duan Baoyuan was also read out, proving that Sheng Gai was begging while playing the erhu in front of the Third Hospital of Peking University.

The testimony of witness Ling Xiaoguang was also read out, proving that Sheng Gaizheng played the erhu to beg.

The testimony of witness Guo Quanhua was also read out, proving that Liu Zhimin played the erhu and begged at Peking University Third Hospital.

Presiding Judge: Defendant, what do you think?

Defendant Liu Society: No opinion.

Defendant Zhang Xinli: I didn’t go out every day.

Defendant Liu Huimin: No opinion.

Defendant Wang Li: No opinion.

Prosecutor: Read the testimony of witness Wu Shichang (the landlord of the defendant’s rented house), proving that Wang Li, Liu Sheshe, Zhang Xinli, and Liu Huimin organized blind people to beg. Every day, the three brothers and their daughter-in-law took the four blind men out before 7 o'clock in the morning, and came back around 12 o'clock in the evening. They went out every day, no matter it was windy or rainy, and there was no time when they did not go out.

Presiding Judge: Defendant, what do you think?

Defendant Liu Society: No.

Defendant Zhang Xinli: No.

Defendant Liu Huimin: No.

Defendant Wang Li: No.

Prosecutor: Read the testimony of witness Lu Guichen, proving that the police arrested the defendants Wang Li, Liu Sheshe, Liu Huimin, and Zhang Xinli.

The testimony of witness Wang Xiaodong was also presented to prove that the police captured the criminal suspects Wang Li, Liu Sheshe, Liu Huimin, and Zhang Xinli.

Presiding Judge: Defendant, what do you think?

Defendant Liu Society: No.

Defendant Zhang Xinli: No.

Defendant Liu Huimin: No.

Defendant Wang Li: No.

Prosecutor: The following records of inquest and inspection are presented to prove that on May 1, 2010, under the witness of witness Zha Fenglin, the police conducted an inspection on the rental house in Chengshou Temple, Fengtai District, where Wang Li temporarily resided in Beijing. After the inspection, the police found no suspicious items, the person under inspection cooperated with the work, and there was no loss or damage to the indoor items.

Presiding Judge: Defendant, what do you think?

Defendant Liu Society: No.

Defendant Zhang Xinli: No.

Defendant Liu Huimin: No.

Defendant Wang Li: No.

Prosecutor: Show the physical evidence photos, 2 photos of the victim Liu Zhimin and his begging tools, to prove the situation of Liu Zhimin and his begging tools.

Two photos of the victim Sheng Gaizheng and his begging tools prove the condition of Sheng Gaizheng and his begging tools.

One photo of the victim Sun Maodan, proving Sun Maodan’s condition.

A photo of the victim Zhao Ruyi proves Zhao Ruyi’s condition.

Ten photos of rental houses prove the living environment of blind people in rental houses in Chengshou Temple, Fengtai District.

Presiding Judge: Defendant, what do you think?

Defendant Liu Society: No.

Defendant Zhang Xinli: No.

Defendant Liu Huimin: No.

Defendant Wang Li: No.

Prosecutor: Present the diagnosis certificate and medical records. Liu Zhimin’s diagnosis certificate and medical records prove Liu Zhimin’s visual disability in both eyes.

Sheng corrected the diagnosis certificate and medical record materials to prove that he was diagnosed with visual disability in both eyes due to corneal leukoplakia in both eyes, atrophy of the right eyeball, and staphyloma in the left cornea.

Sun Maodan’s diagnosis certificate and medical records prove that Sun Maodan was diagnosed with visual disability in both eyes on April 30, 2010.

Zhao Ruyi’s diagnosis certificate and medical records prove that Zhao Ruyi was diagnosed with visual disability in both eyes on April 30, 2010.

Presiding Judge: Defendant, what do you think?

Defendant Liu Society: No.

Defendant Zhang Xinli: No.

Defendant Liu Huimin: No.

Defendant Wang Li: No.

Prosecutor: Present the criminal case registration form to prove that Liu Sheshe, Liu Huimin, Zhang Xinli, and Wang Li organized an organization to coerce disabled people to beg and were caught by the police.

Presiding Judge: Defendant, what do you think?

Defendant Liu Society: No.

Defendant Zhang Xinli: No.

Defendant Liu Huimin: No.

Defendant Wang Li: No.

Prosecutor: Show the process of coming to the case to prove that Wang Li’s passive process of coming to the case did not involve surrendering or committing meritorious service. It was proved that Liu Huimin was passive in the process of attending the case, and Wang Li assisted the public security organs in arresting the co-defendants. Prove the arrival process of Zhang Xinli and Liu Society.

Presiding Judge: Defendant, what do you think?

Defendant Liu Society: No.

Defendant Zhang Xinli: No.

Defendant Liu Huimin: No.

Defendant Wang Li: No.

Prosecutor: Show the defendant’s identity certificate to prove the defendant’s identity.

Presiding Judge: Defendant, what do you think?

Defendant Liu Society: No.

Defendant Zhang Xinli: No.

Defendant Liu Huimin: No.

Defendant Wang Li: No.

Prosecutor: Showing the case handling instructions, it is currently impossible to find the victim and the blind man named Cao.

Presiding Judge: Defendant, what do you think?

Defendant Liu Society: No.

Defendant Zhang Xinli: No.

Defendant Liu Huimin: No.

Defendant Liu Huimin: No.

Presiding Judge: What other evidence does the prosecutor need to present to this court?

Prosecutor: The evidence has been presented.

Presiding Judge: What evidence does the defendant need to submit to this court?

Defendant Liu Society: No.

Defendant Zhang Xinli: No.

Defendant Liu Huimin: No.

Defendant Wang Li: No.

Presiding Judge: Does the defendant apply to notify new witnesses to come to court, obtain new physical evidence, and request re-identification or inspection.

Defendant Liu Society: Not applying.

Defendant Zhang Xinli: Do not apply.

Defendant Liu Huimin: Not applying.

Defendant Wang Li: No application.

Presiding Judge: Did the defendant surrender or commit meritorious service?

Defendant Liu Society: No.

Defendant Zhang Xinli: No.

Defendant Liu Huimin: No.

Defendant Wang Li: No.

Presiding Judge: The court investigation is over, and the court debate will begin. The public prosecutor will first express his opinion on the prosecution.

Prosecutor: The presiding judge and jurors, through the court investigation just now, have proven that the facts of the charges in our court’s indictment are clear and the evidence is indeed sufficient. We now issue the following prosecutorial opinions:

1. The four defendants used violence and coercion to organize multiple disabled people to beg, and their actions have constituted the crime of organizing disabled people to beg;

2. The four defendants’ behavior has serious social harm, They should be punished in accordance with the law;

3. The defendants can be given a lighter punishment;

4. It is hoped that the four defendants will learn lessons and rehabilitate themselves through today's court hearing.

Presiding Judge: Next, the defendants will defend themselves in turn.

Defendant Liu Society: We have provided basic living conditions for disabled people.

Defendant Zhang Xinli: I have never beaten or scolded the victim.

Defendant Liu Huimin: I have never beaten or scolded a blind person.

Defendant Wang Li: I beat him, but no one else saw it.

Presiding Judge: Is there anything else the prosecutor would like to add?

Prosecutor: As for the four defendants’ defense that they did not hit anyone, the prosecutor believes that the four defendants’ confessions in the public security organs are stable and mutually corroborated with the victim’s statements and witness testimony, all of which confirm the four defendants’ confessions. If someone uses means of beating, scolding, or coercion to organize disabled people to beg, it shall constitute the crime of organizing disabled people to beg.

Presiding Judge: The court debate is over, and the defendants will make their final statements one by one.

Defendant Liu Society: I hope I will be given a lighter punishment.

Defendant Zhang Xinli: I hope I will be given a lighter punishment.

Defendant Liu Huimin: I hope I will be given a lighter punishment.

Defendant Wang Li: I hope I will be given a lighter punishment.

Presiding Judge: The court will now be adjourned, and the collegial panel will conduct a review. The results of the review will be announced separately. Take the four defendants down.

Moderator: Dear netizens, the presiding judge has now announced an adjournment and the trial has ended. This court trial live broadcast has received the care and support of Yao Xueqian and Zhao Yan from the Legal Publicity Department of the Beijing Higher People's Court. Our institute's research office has provided technical guidance. I would like to express my gratitude and express my gratitude to the staff who participated in this court trial live broadcast for their hard work. Express thanks.

Statement: The record of this trial is not a transcript of the trial. It is only for reference by netizens who are concerned about the trial and has no legal effect.

The source of this material: Beijing Lawyer Resource Network